Quote:
Originally Posted by Koko the munkey
Unfortunately, the big game in town (now played as 10-300) is probably corrupt. I apologize for the use of a 0-post account. However, the collusion team has been known to use intimidation tactics against those that stir up trouble for them, and I'd rather not subject myself to that. If you are someone that could potentially help do something about this, I would be happy to work through PM to confirm that you can be trusted, and I would then divulge my identity.
Ok, with that out of the way, why do I just say "probably" corrupt? Well, first off, because I freely admit I don't have any hard evidence that tells me without a doubt that there's active & regular collusion in Deadwood. Just about everything I know about it is 2nd hand information. Secondly, an accusation of cheating is very serious. I recognize that. And I can't prove collusion. Even from an anonymous account, I'm not going to name names of the cheats. That being said, I
believe there is regular collusion in Deadwood's biggest game.
So, why do I believe that the game is crooked? Well, the #1 reason is that a player I've been friendly with for over a decade confided in me that he was approached by the collusion team and asked to join (he turned them down). In the years I've known this guy, I have never caught this guy in the slightest bit of dishonesty. I'm aware that nobody knows anybody as well as they may think they do, but I would still lay large odds he's not making anything up here. Still, I can hardly scream 2nd hand information from the rooftops as proof.
A different poster mentioned that because the casinos are now hardasses with the cell phone rules, that the accusations are being taken seriously. All I can say, is that if you played locally, you'd recognize that this cell phone business is basically only worthy of eye-rolls. Players have indeed used cell phones to cheat in Deadwood...years ago. Anyone want to take any guesses how they were caught? A cocktail waitress (a cocktail waitress!) caught them at it. So gaming's "no cell phone even if you're out of a hand" rule is many years behind the times. The cheats have moved onto more sophisticated signals. Oh, and does anyone know what happened to the cheats using cell phones? Nothing! I have heard from multiple sources that the reason for this is that the floorpeople at Cadillac Jack's and the Lodge are paid off. It meshes with what I know, but unfortunately, still isn't proof.
The Lodge was the original host to the big game in town. However, a little more than a year ago, they moved the game to Cadillac Jack's. I have heard rumors of the floor there being corrupt, and occasionally getting prestacked decks into the game to deal particular players a massive cooler. Imagine how it looked to me when shortly after the game moved, the bad beat was hit, with winner's and loser's share both going to people associated with the team (one was in on the ground floor, but may have left, the other was a current member of the team). Could it be a coincidence? Sure. Do I think it is? No.
Earlier I mentioned that the collusion team has long since changed its tactics. The #1 way I have heard that they collude, is that they signal at least their hole cards to each other, and possibly other information as well. This is one place I have first hand information experience. And I actually have two stories to tell here.
#1: Shortly after learning about the team, and their identities, I saw just two of them playing together in a cash game. Being the type of person that likes to get some independent verification of things, I decided to sit down, play like a piece of granite to limit my exposure, and closely watch how the alleged cheats played. I admittedly didn't see anything blatant in their play. They didn't pull the obvious trick of sandwiching a civilian in between their raises. Maybe they did some other stuff with their play, but it was too subtle for me to pick out.
However, I did notice something very suspicious. I noticed that every time they were dealt cards, the player on the right would glance very quickly at the team member to the left's hands/chips. I could never decipher what information he was gathering. Of course, I know a defense of this would simply be that the alleged member to the right was looking left to see if anyone was folding. Of course, he was only looking at one person's hand. I guess the defense there would be he knew a tell with that guy. Still, it was very odd to me,
especially given that it was matching what I was told to look for. In the interest of full disclosure, I will say that I never saw the player to the left look to his right. I wish I could offer up that quite damning bit of evidence, but I can't honestly do it.
Still, to me, this session was super suspicious.
#2: A while after this, one of the team members wandered into the Silverado while I was playing their big game, and when he was sitting down, he started talking to a couple guys in the game that were obviously friends, and were guys I know not to be on the team. These friends obviously knew the team member, and they immediately started engaging in some good-natured the ribbing of the guy. The team member very quickly retorted with "have you guys got your signals worked out?"
Now, on the surface, that comment could be taken as "well, yeah, that's an obvious comeback, accuse the buddies of collusion". But it's the
way he accused them of collusion. I've spent a lot of time playing live poker, and I imagine many readers of this post have spent more time than me. Many times I've seen accusations of collusion. Usually directed at a husband & wife, sometimes obvious friends. I'm sure you all have too. Has anyone here ever heard anyone accuse anyone of using signaling? I
never have. Would be one giant freaking coincidence to me if all my information is wrong, and the guy who was wrongly accused of being on the team, accused someone of collusion in a way I've never heard before, that happens to match the method of collusion he is accused of using. Seems about as likely as hitting a bad beat innocently shortly after moving your game, lol.
I've heard that South Dakota gaming is paid off to the very top. I don't know if it is or not. But I do find it funny that if you Google "Why is South Dakota so" and let Google auto-complete it, the third thing listed is "corrupt". I haven't tried all 50 states, but I can't find a single other one that comes up that way. Even Nevada and New Jersey. So there's a fun bit of trivia for you, for reading this far into my post.
So, here's the current poker rundown in Deadwood:
Cadillac Jack's has the 10-300 game that I believe is full of collusion. I also believe their casino staff is corrupt. I would not recommend playing in this game. I'm not sure if they still occasionally play at The Lodge anymore or not, but the same comment would apply there. If either room gets a smaller game (3-25, 2-10, are the usual suspects I think), those games are likely fine. Of course, if you play in them, you're likely supporting casinos that allow cheating to flourish. Also, whatever you do, steer clear of tournaments for any serious money. While my focus in this post has been cash games (as that's my main area of interest), the team's true area of dominance is tournaments.
The Silverado gets a 5-100 going on the weekends. The action is very good, dealers are, as a group, the best in town. They also routinely spread a 2-20, and on Fridays get a 2-20 O8 game usually. I think there's some sort of mix game they get on Tuesdays as well. I haven't paid much attention to whatever goes on then. I have never seen members of the team in any cash game there. On Thursday nights they have a $98 MTT. I usually see 2-3 of the team in that tourney. Collusion effects are likely minimal, though. The rumor I've heard for why they're playing it is to start setting up the staff at the Silverado to be corrupted. I hope they try. There's only one dealer there that I get the feeling would be susceptible to corruption, so I really hope they just go a bit too hard at the wrong guy, and get their asses busted. I play at the Silverado, and will continue to do so, but I am being vigilant.
The Silverado also has an $1,100 tournament coming up. (
http://www.silveradofranklin.com/sou...mpionship.html). I would be
very hesitant to enter this tournament. Maybe if I could walk-in the day of, and survey the room for known team members, then if they weren't seen, I'd buy-in. But my advice to anyone else about playing that MTT without knowledge of who's on the team? Don't do it. Also, to be clear here, I don't think the Silverado is on the take with the team. I more think that their management is in the unfortunate position of having to either tell 8 (or more) local big fish that "we don't have any proof of cheating, but you're barred from playing this tourney" or letting them in. Now, if they actually did bar the team members, that would make my fat ass do cartwheels, so maybe the prospect of that spectacle will sway them. Of course, I understand that they have to do what they have to do. But I too have to do what I think is right there...and that is warn everyone away from their big tourney.
In my opinion, The Saloon #10 is 100% safe. It's also in my heart as my favorite casino in town. The problem is that usually their only action is 2-10 or 3-15 or thereabouts. On Thursdays they play 2-10 dealer's choice where your choice is any of like 10 games. Occasionally, they'll get a random 2-100 game going. And because of the nature of the place (it's basically a party-bar that happens to have some poker tables) the game is usually incredible. Like, any good player can party like it's 2004 type incredible. If you ever see that game going, sit in it. Thank me later. With all the Sklansky dollars you make, you can buy me a Sklansky beer. Additionally, I know at least one member of the team isn't exactly welcome there.
Finally, again, if anyone out there happens to read this, and can offer any help to eradicate this scourge on Deadwood poker, I would love to hear from you. Of course, the whole "let's earn each other's trust" thing is going to be arduous, but I'm willing to give it a shot.