Quote:
Originally Posted by cmurl904
IMO, the problem with PC LHE is that it's a 'niche' game, and attracts somewhat knowledgeable players (like us 2+2 'ers), or tight rocks.
Big picture...no one wants to play LHE between 3/6 & 10/20.
Ashame, because the 6/12 game used to be really good. I'm not that surprised that the PC game isn't successful, because the kind of players who made that game (and 6/12) so good are all playing 1/2 NL nowadays.
As far as the limit structure goes, maybe replacing 3/6 with 4/8 would be a change for the better. If the 3/6 regs complain, then spread the 4/8
like Harrah's with mini-blinds ($1 SB/$2 BB). Bringing back 6/12 (or 8/16), probably wouldn't change things much.
If Razz and 2-7 TD are approved, it will be very interesting to see how (and what limits) they'll be spread.
You may be on to something, with LHE being dead between 3-6 & 10-20... due to the insane popularity of 1-2NL. It just seems like such a HUGE gap, however. There should be something that can be done to get people to step up a bit from 3-6, without making the jump all the way to 10-20.
You can't have 3-6 & 4-8 competing against each other, though. And, I don't think mini-blinds would do much to help (in 4-8). It's doubtful that 3-6 could be killed off and replaced with 4-8. That seems to be an East Coast culture thing. Whereas, in Vegas, 4-8 is the culture. But, Vegas doesn't spread 10-20, so the gap between 4-8 & 15-30 is the 8-16 game. That game seems to be somewhat stable out there.
Without an attempt at revamping all the limit structures, replacing 10-20 with 15-30, 20-40 with 30-60, etc., I don't see many choices to fill voids. The 5-10 game has gone by the wayside and PC can't stand on its own two feet.
Maybe we should look at 6-12. In it's old form, I am not sure it would fly. Played with $2 chips (albeit a sizable investment for the Borg), it could spark some interest, since it then becomes a 2-chip/3-chip blind, stimulating action. You could add the 1/2 kill option, too.
6-12 would be just about in the middle of 3-6 & 10-20 and allow the conventional structures to remain, yet still give the house a unique advantage over other rooms.
Another option to think about is, 5-10 with pink chips and a half or full kill. Full being preferred. Not sure about that, but it could be easily implemented without any additional costs. That might be worth a shot.
On another note... I suspect that the Razz & TD games might enjoy some short-lived, limited success at lower limits and they would also be appealing to onliners, as part of a multi-game rotation. I feel, however, that they would, as individual games, or part of a rotation, be much more popular at higher limits (30 and up). The novelty would quickly wear off for low-limit players, especially the noobs, who would most certainly fail in a big way in these games. Good to see Stan taking the lead in AC on getting them approved and in play, though!!!
I'm just trying to brainstorm some options here. I could be quite happy sitting 10-20, or even 20-40 (although I would MUCH prefer 15-30 over 20-40 because of the blind structure). Stan's working very hard to get games spread that make players happy. Of course this makes great business sense for the Borg, but it is really cool to have some input with the decision maker. And, if we can get happy players donating money... well, that makes good business sense for us, too
Stan, what are your thoughts on filling the "LHE gap"?