Quote:
Originally Posted by crackleback
Oh, don't get me wrong, game was great fun and jerry was entertaining despite being obnoxious. And yes they were 3 deep trying to get on table. One guy bought his seat for $100 from a guy jerry didn't want at his table anymore lol...
That guy was me. I had no idea who he was, but now having learned and listened to his online interview I find it very interesting. He was playing completely recklessly doing things such as raising blind to $300, or reraising people all-in with garbage preflop. I was shocked that some of the Borgata dealers and even the floor didn't know how to handle this situation. One dealer was completely confused and had to call the floor over who wouldn't let him raise blind because it "wasn't his turn". WHAT?? Of course if someone wants to blind raise it's completely legal. Perhaps different casinos have their own rules but a blind raise should certainly be allowed. In my experience, it should go as follows (for a 2-5 game): The action starts at $5 to go. *If* no one raises (either folds or just calls $5), when it gets to the blind raisers position the action becomes $500 to go. *If* someone raises prior to the blind raiser, that effectively changes the action, so the blind raiser has the option of completely taking back his bet and doing whatever he wants. This is not how it was handled - it was handled in a non-uniform fashion depending on the dealer. One dealer didn't let him blind raise, FORCING him to take his chips back after dealing the hand! He called the floor over who confirmed that he couldn't blind bet since it "wasn't his turn", ufb. One dealer held him to whatever chips he put out, regardless of the action in front of him but disregarded his verbal statements. One dealer, a young woman who definitely was the best dealer I had that night, came the closest by holding him to whatever verbal statement or action he made before his action. Her only mistake IHMO was that she didn't give him the option to change his action if there was a raise in front of him. Even so, her handling of Jared and her general dealing speed and professionalism was outstanding. Anyone remember her name?
Jared was either drunk or just plain "having fun" or whatever. However, in retrospect while he obviously is a phenomenal online nose-bleed player, it appears to me that he perhaps doesn't have a ton of live experience. I knew his "trust fund kid" story was a ruse, but the way he was playing and his demeanor didn't give me a clue to his true identity, well played.
As insane and reckless as he was playing he appeared to be very annoyed by players that beat him or, in his mind, didn't want to give him wild loose action back. I beat him in a couple of pots and so he said that if I didn't buy shots of Patron for the entire table, at a personal cost to me of $100+ he wasn't going to play anymore. I was in the process of making that happen for him (with the discreet contributions of other players) but then he started making other wild demands to other players, or else threatening he'd quit the game, so the Patron thing kind of fizzled, a shame. Then he just decided he didn't want to play with me at the table at all. He claimed I was "too tight". He also claimed he just "didn't like me" because of a couple of friendly jokes I made.
Anyhow, everyone at the table was pressuring me to leave, so I acquiesced and sold my seat for a mere $100 to young player who was dying to get in on the action. I could have probably drove a harder bargain with the new player and/or other players at the table, but I wasn't in the mood to haggle and felt like having some drinks myself and relaxing. Fun night.
-RJ