Quote:
Originally Posted by FromACtoLV
So there is one contract that says the land can ONLY be used for a casino. There is a second contract that says it can be used for anything EXCEPT a casino.
Yeah, that makes total sense.
Stockton needs to either sue Caesar's or sue their own lawyers.
From the quotes of Stockton principals, they do not want to get into an extended litigation battle about anything. They have stated these issues either disappear or they do. So, for the Taj, there is settlement value, but it must not be overstated.
The whole "first class casino" idea is pretty interesting. Basically, I guess each party had to maintain at Resorts-level of amenities, circa 1988. So, no sawdust or marketing to skinheads. A seventy year old hotel with a motel annex (the old North Tower); some first class joint there. And, apparently, the clause would not limit anyone from closing down, and could not require a new owner to reopen as a casino. So, they have a pretty subjective standard for the covenant and no particular way to enforce it. I call Next Case.