Quote:
Originally Posted by GATOR BAIT
The 10 handed game is a little more crowded, but it is the glue that holds your games together. There is usually one or two walkers in any game, which is no problem in a 10 handed, but becomes a real problem in a 9 handed game, if all seats were not filled before the walkers took off. The thrid man walking rule is hard to enforce and pisses people off. Casual players ( read tourist) do not like to play in short games, so once a game gets down to 6 players it is in danger of breaking, plus no one wants to pay more rake. Your floor people will be swamped with calls for rake reductions. I can see 9 handed in higher structure games were the players are mostly pros. Why not spread both 10 and 9 handed or even 6 handed games and give your players the choice? Only then will you be able to see which games over all hold together? You have done such a good job in starting your room I do not want to see it begin to slide backwards. Right now with the WSOP going on the games will last, but when it comes back to normal I will be very surprised if they do.
Possibly the stupidest thing written in this thread.
Look- 9-handed tables are the norm in a big part of the poker world. People are OK with it. It works. Nobody gives that much of a **** if it gets down to 7-handed. "casual players" are the vast majority in places like LA that have 9-handed tables, and not a one of them is arguing to make the tables 10-handed.
I've been playing at Aria this week and despite the high number of vastly overqualified people playing (which, unfortunately, seems to be the case everywhere this WSOP), 9-handed is sooooooooo much better.