Quote:
Originally Posted by NuklearWinter
People tipping $1 when they win $6 in a split pot is nice for the dealer and bad for the players.
You won't see much faster anywhere else in town.
Quote:
Originally Posted by NuklearWinter
The $8/16 had more loose older asian gambler types, and the $4/8 is mostly old people that limp every hand and check the nuts in position on the river (very slow game).
Unlucky draw of players/time of day. You get plenty of three-bet-anything, straddle, gamble-for-the-sake-of-gambling, types in the 4-8 game, depending on when you play.
Quote:
Originally Posted by NuklearWinter
People play awful hands and chase (as expected).
True. In the long run, that's good news.
Quote:
Originally Posted by NuklearWinter
With the rake+JP drop every hand I'm not sure the $4/8 is even beatable unless the table is amazing.
There's generally enough action, provided you can make good decisions and reads post-flop. I won a fair deal last time, and as I like to say, if I can....anyone...can.
Quote:
Originally Posted by NuklearWinter
Even the $8/16 I feel is tough to beat for more than a few BBs/100 hands. CAZ is taking minimum $100 off the table every hour in rake+JP, plus ~$15-25 tips/hr as well. Playing for 4 hours removes a lot of cash off the table, and you might get to see 100 hands during this time.
Well, no objection there -- at least to the obscene rake part. There's a lot of money coming off live poker tables, especially at low-limits, especially in games with split pots and healthy tippers.
Quote:
Originally Posted by NuklearWinter
I feel like even at a great table these games are just marginally beatable at best.
Possibly true, but there's a few players making regular withdrawals from the 4-8 economy.
Quote:
Originally Posted by NuklearWinter
Lastly, I suck at hi/lo and there is no reason CAZ should not start a PLO $1/2 with $5 bring in game.
I also agree completely. I'd enjoy donating $100 bills as I got better at PLO.