Mohegan Sun (Uncasville, CT) - Page 337 - Venues & Communities -- Two Plus Two Poker Forums

The $1000 per hour is the regular Friday HH and Saturdays is somewhat similar with it ranging from $500-1200 hourly depending on the one-hour window. The only real variation is including it all day on Sunday.

That's for August. The weekend of Sept. 15 16 17 they are doing $1000 an hour. Fri 3-3 Sat 3-3 Sun 12-12.

Their HH days are Friday Sept. 1, and on the Mondays of the 11th and 25th. $600 to $1000

Quote

09-18-2017 , 07:58 PM

#8402

lee jone's

enthusiast

Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 80

When Foxwoods raises the rake to $5, Will everyone from Foxwoods be moving to MS October 1?

Quote

09-18-2017 , 08:01 PM

#8403

tellypl

adept

Join Date: Sep 2014 Posts: 939

Quote:

Originally Posted by lee jone's

When Foxwoods raises the rake to $5, Will everyone from Foxwoods be moving to MS October 1?

I doubt it will make a big difference. Most recreationals (majority of players) don't know what rake is.

Quote

09-18-2017 , 09:02 PM

#8404

413AceKing

old hand

Join Date: Dec 2010 Posts: 1,340

Quote:

Originally Posted by lee jone's

When Foxwoods raises the rake to $5, Will everyone from Foxwoods be moving to MS October 1?

I think the question to be asking is "When will Mohegan match Foxwoods' rake?"

Quote

09-23-2017 , 08:45 AM

#8405

venice10

Referee

Join Date: Nov 2007 Posts: 25,852

Quote:

Originally Posted by 413AceKing

I think the question to be asking is "When will Mohegan match Foxwoods' rake?"

Unless they see a massive move of players to their room, 3 months tops.

Quote

09-23-2017 , 11:12 AM

#8406

MontyBurns

grinder

Join Date: Oct 2003 Posts: 670

It all depends. Haven't been there in ages, do the 2-5 regs still collude?

Quote

09-23-2017 , 11:38 AM

#8407

RhodyGuy

old hand

Join Date: Oct 2010 Posts: 1,391

Quote:

Originally Posted by MontyBurns

It all depends. Haven't been there in ages, do the 2-5 regs still collude?

Only the husband/wife or boyfriend/girlfriend who sit next to each other. Three players left the table one day last month when complaint was made and nothing was done about it.

Those other day nits you're referring to are long gone and now colluding at Twin River.

Quote

09-23-2017 , 12:19 PM

#8408

Kurn, son of Mogh

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 16,230

If they're sitting next to each other to collude, they're doing it wrong.

Quote

09-23-2017 , 05:39 PM

#8409

lee jone's

enthusiast

Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 80

There was a brother/sister inlaw sitting at the same table last night at Foxwoods. Didn't seem to be colluding at all. A lot of people were talking about the rake going up at Foxwoods, saying they were gonna have to try Mohegan.

Quote

09-23-2017 , 09:43 PM

#8410

clide9

centurion

Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 180

Ive been playing a while at foxwoods and plan on going to Mohegan after the rake goes up in October. From what I can gauge, it doesn’t seem to bother other players as much as me. I don’t think enough people will switch to put any pressure on foxwoods.
I called Mohegan and they told me they have no plans to change their rake. We’ll see. This might be an edge over Foxwoods that they can use

Quote

09-23-2017 , 11:41 PM

#8411

RhodyGuy

old hand

Join Date: Oct 2010 Posts: 1,391

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kurn, son of Mogh

If they're sitting next to each other to collude, they're doing it wrong.

How are they doing it wrong? When the room openly allows for it there is not even a need to attempt to disguise it. They are doing it very right because they are allowed to sit next to each other and whisper what they folded when the other is in a hand.

Quote

09-24-2017 , 11:11 AM

#8412

Kurn, son of Mogh

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 16,230

Quote:

Originally Posted by RhodyGuy

The idea is to trap other players between you when one member of the team has a good hand. If you have to verbally tell your partner what your cards are, you suck at collusion. First of all, even rank amateurs can catch you doing it, and secondly, you can't take advantage of positioning to force the mark to put more money in the pot.

Knowing what your partner folded is a tiny advantage. Knowing both your partner's cards and the flop while in the pot with the mark is a much larger advantage.

Quote

09-25-2017 , 11:02 AM

#8413

wesrwood

temp-banned

Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 22,886

Mohegan and Foxwoods basically have the same promo today?

Anyone know how deep the waiting list is at Mohegan? It's not
On bravo

Quote

09-25-2017 , 11:11 AM

#8414

Lattimer

I is smart

Join Date: Feb 2009 Posts: 15,463

Bravo app has the waitlists. 1/1nl has 10 waiting, all other games have less.

Quote

09-25-2017 , 11:14 AM

#8415

wesrwood

temp-banned

Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 22,886

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lattimer

Bravo app has the waitlists. 1/1nl has 10 waiting, all other games have less.

Yea it's showing now. The first time
I checked it said unavailable to view

Quote

09-28-2017 , 03:49 PM

#8416

Notthistimebuddy

banned

Join Date: Jul 2017 Posts: 102

who wants to start a collusion team with me @ 2/5 NL here since the floor openly allows it? easy money!

Quote

09-29-2017 , 12:09 AM

#8417

sevencard2003

banned

Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 2,642

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kurn, son of Mogh

im not sure how this type of collusion works and how 2 guys would put it into practice effectively. usually the type of collusion i see is 2 guys checking it down HU once others fold, or saying IF U CALL ill check it down with u, and im not sure which type is the more serious offense

Quote

09-29-2017 , 08:27 AM

#8418

Kurn, son of Mogh

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 16,230

Quote:

Originally Posted by sevencard2003

im not sure how this type of collusion works and how 2 guys would put it into practice effectively. usually the type of collusion i see is 2 guys checking it down HU once others fold, or saying IF U CALL ill check it down with u, and im not sure which type is the more serious offense

They use chip placement to tell their partner what their cards are when they raise pre, so the partner can determine the strength of the hand post flop. partner calls pre flop, and if the flop is right he/she has the opportunity in the right circumstance, to force the mark to put more money in the pot. Probably works better in limit because people expect more semibluff raising OTF.

As to telling your partner what cards you have using your chips, I could probably teach you how to do that in 5 minutes.

Quote

09-29-2017 , 09:26 AM

#8419

clide9

centurion

Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 180

Checking in down once heads up between two colluding players makes absolutely no sense. Where do you see an advantage there?

Quote

09-29-2017 , 09:28 AM

#8420

Kurn, son of Mogh

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 16,230

Quote:

Originally Posted by clide9

Checking in down once heads up between two colluding players makes absolutely no sense. Where do you see an advantage there?

None in a cash game, but there certainly is in a tournament where a 3rd player might be all-in.

Quote

09-29-2017 , 10:48 AM

#8421

aaronk56

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 17,733

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kurn, son of Mogh

None in a cash game, but there certainly is in a tournament where a 3rd player might be all-in.

Two people checking down weak or medium strength hands in a tournament with a third person all-in is standard and good strategy. Collusion has nothing to do with it.

Quote

09-29-2017 , 10:50 AM

#8422

aaronk56

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 17,733

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kurn, son of Mogh

When you see this I hope you immediately call out the person's hand. If not you're complicit in their cheating.

Quote

09-29-2017 , 12:51 PM

#8423

Kurn, son of Mogh

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 16,230

Quote:

Originally Posted by aaronk56

When you see this I hope you immediately call out the person's hand. If not you're complicit in their cheating.

Last time I saw this happen was about 10 years ago and I informed the floor immediately.

I don't usually play high enough stakes to worry about competent cheaters anyway. rarely higher than than 10/20

Quote

09-29-2017 , 04:21 PM

#8424

27offsuit

actions have consequences!

Join Date: Jul 2004 Posts: 38,530

Quote:

Originally Posted by aaronk56

Two people checking down weak or medium strength hands in a tournament with a third person all-in is standard and good strategy. Collusion has nothing to do with it.

Except for when one of them says 'you want to check it down?..' beforehand, which I have witnessed too many times to count.

Quote

09-29-2017 , 08:34 PM

#8425

Kurn, son of Mogh

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 16,230

Quote:

Originally Posted by aaronk56

Two people checking down weak or medium strength hands in a tournament with a third person all-in is standard and good strategy. Collusion has nothing to do with it.

I didn't say it was collusion. I said it was often an advantage in a tournament where it has zero intrinsic advantage in a cash game. As long as you keep your mouth shut while you're doing it.

Quote

Page 337 of 388

First

137 237 287 317 327 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 347 357 387

Last

Post Reply Subscribe

...

Page 337 of 388

First

137 237 287 317 327 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 347 357 387

Last