which of these hands do you fold ?


1- http://www.boomplayer.com/en/poker-h...519_C134C80F1D

2- http://www.boomplayer.com/en/poker-h...529_FC25EAA445

3-http://www.boomplayer.com/en/poker-hands/Boom/16624579_5B0EFF927A

4-http://www.boomplayer.com/en/poker-hands/Boom/16624635_A2F5BC6E5F

5- http://www.boomplayer.com/en/poker-h...665_FD7FE2D224

After a general look at all your hands, it seems like there's a bad field at 45man sng 1$ or less

1. i prefer donk/folding OTF. As played i'd normally fold OTT.

2. bet bigger (75% or more) OTF. Almost never fold here. I'd fold here only to a really tight player postflop.

3 bet OTF. As played, 3bet OTF. This helps you avoid the river situation where chances are he might have hit 2 pair+. I'd call now as i've seen how the previous plays.

4. shove OTT. Calling is bad there, imo. You give him a chance to complete his flush.
Now, after seeing his cards, i feel like being more aggro and taking the lead by betting is a good play on this field.

5. good push. no worries that you ran into QQ

Keep in mind that my feedback is given without any reads.

Hope this helps

It was very helpful,and i know it's difficult to comment without villian's info.

1-The guy was limping almost 60% of the times,I had a note of donkey,but I just only called,because of the double ace on board.

2-Yeah,i've seen that,i should bet more OTF.

3-Because of the field,i preffer to keep the week e bluff range on flop,they think check flop with ace on the board is weakness.But it's a good move check/raise OTF.

4- i don't get it OTT,cause part of his call range OTF is weaker aces,PP and flush draws,raise OTT i'm always loosing,when the player calls.

tks man!

Hard to give good analysis in the absence of any reads/stats

1. raising would not be a donk it would be a cbet. my line would depend so much on villain. but yeah cbet fold to a rr isnt terrible if you think hes a fish and therefore has more ax hands in his range then a good player. As played i would call ( as mentioned i wouldn't of checked flop) My reasoning is the turn being an ace it makes it less likely form a hand combination perspective he has one and even with more flush drawers to protect against is he really shoving for value with ax. I mean i can see him betting to protect but fish hate to loose value with there perceived monsters. i know its only a pot sized bet effective and really to a decent player (without levelling considerations) its the only bet size that makes sense really but to a fish with an ace he would probably bet less.

2.
4x is a standard raise over an iso without antes. With antes and a week field definitely raise more pre. at this B.I it would depend on table but id proably raise to 5.5bb. And yeah c bet bigger and stack of ( less people would of seen flop so your hand strength would be stronger in relative terms)

3. impossible to comment i wouldn't play any where near this line. You obviously have some reasoning for your line with this player/ player pool tendencies in mind.
I have no idea how peeps play at this level your analyzing hands in isolation but your bets when you hit will have to balance with all those c bets where you miss when you go up in stakes and play observant players.

4. raise bigger pre for sure. the rest hard to say higher stacks your c bet will have to be larger. im not even going to ask if you balance this sizing with missed c bets as vs your opposition why would you. they are simply awful. and yeah i would stack of on turn and he would of coolered me.
With the bigger raise pre and the bigger c bet ( bigger as a percentage of pot and that pot being larger) you would be 100% committed to stacking of after c bet with your hand on this flop

5. yeah agreed good shove
vs these players dont get fancy play syndrome just play solid tag poker with larger bet sizing.

Thanks Uragnatha!! Good insights !!!