Quote:
Originally Posted by Decay95
Agreed, as a new player though I find it super hard to get it in pre flop with anything but a huge pocket pair, even with less than 15 or 20 bb when I play SnGs. If I knew the numbers and knew AK was almost on par with something like JJ or 1010 (or are those pairs way ahead of AK?) then I would go in more often, I just don't know the numbers, and holding a big pair pre flop generates a lot of confidence.
In a direct matchup JJ is stronger than AK, but you are always playing against the opponents range, not picking either of two hands to go up against each other.
AK blocks half the combos of AA and KK whereas JJ/TT doesn't. It also has 3 and 6 outs against KK and QQ respectively, whereas JJ/TT has two outs. It also performs better against AQ.
Including the blockers, AKo performs as well as JJ against KK+, and does better against any range wider than that up to and including JJ+, AKs, AKo and is slightly worse against TT+, AKs, AKo with JJ pulling ahead as you widen the range. (AKs also beats those edge cases)
As for TT, AKo is only half a percent behind TT against KK+ and does better against any wider range up to and including 88+, AJs+, AQo+ (TT pulls ahead once you add 77 to their range - but it never really has a big advantage until you get really wide and start adding unpaired undercards like 87s).
It's kind of academic which hand does better against really wide ranges anyway, because you would play both hands against a really wide range. Against premiums, where you have a tricky decision, AKo is just as good if not better against those hands. AKs is even better (better even than QQ until you get as wide as JJ+, AKs+, AKo+).