Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
0 4 handed: Interesting spot with AK 0 4 handed: Interesting spot with AK

12-04-2011 , 08:35 PM
Fold or call?



    Poker Stars, $13.77 Buy-in (2,500/5,000 blinds, 500 ante) No Limit Hold'em Tournament, 4 Players
    Poker Tools Powered By Holdem Manager - The Ultimate Poker Software Suite. View Hand #11231562

    CO: 79,396 (15.9 bb)
    BTN: 55,746 (11.1 bb)
    SB: 34,598 (6.9 bb)
    Hero (BB): 100,260 (20.1 bb)

    Preflop: Hero is BB with A K
    CO raises to 78,896 and is all-in, 3 folds

    Spoiler:
    Results: 14,500 pot
    CO mucked and won 14,500 (9,000 net)



    Get the Flash Player to use the Hold'em Manager Replayer.
    12-04-2011 , 09:01 PM
    snapcall and high five monitor.

    prlly something like this readless:

    88+ ATs+ AJo+
    12-05-2011 , 05:56 AM
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Ssick_one
    snapcall and high five monitor.
    this
    12-05-2011 , 07:01 AM
    this isn't really interesting because there is only one answer: call. I would like to have more such spots on FTs

    This would be interesting if all of them shoved in front of you :P
    12-05-2011 , 12:09 PM
    If we are not calling this, then what are we calling with ? Snappp.
    12-05-2011 , 01:04 PM
    I think op might be trying to over compensate for icm because of the 2 shorter stacks.
    Super duper easy snap though
    12-05-2011 , 01:43 PM
    snap and close you eyes and hope it holds
    12-05-2011 , 02:34 PM
    Even with bigger ICM considerations than in this case, this is still a fist-pump-snap-call. I think whoever said 88+, AJ, ATs+ was on reasonable ground. I might add 77 too.
    12-05-2011 , 03:22 PM
    Most are wwwwwaaayyyy wider then AJo+ ATs+ 88+ here.
    I see bad players doing this with 22+ Ax all the time.
    12-05-2011 , 04:16 PM
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by broerstolyko
    Most are wwwwwaaayyyy wider then AJo+ ATs+ 88+ here.
    I see bad players doing this with 22+ Ax all the time.
    And thats why the correct ICM range is AJo+ ATs+ 88+ here... lol

    serious trollin ITT
    12-05-2011 , 05:17 PM
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Ssick_one
    And thats why the correct ICM range is AJo+ ATs+ 88+ here... lol

    serious trollin ITT
    Sorry, I misread. My apologies.
    12-05-2011 , 05:47 PM
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by broerstolyko
    Sorry, I misread. My apologies.
    Your mistake may be forgiven!
    12-05-2011 , 06:33 PM
    What do you guys think is CO's range here?

    I think AK can be too much of a coin flip vs. a tight CO player here. We need around 65/35. At least 60/40.
    Why would you gamble your beautiful stack 50/50 or worse against a tight.
    So how can you automatically call... :/

    Totally depends. Folding is not always bad.


    battster41, was he tight?
    wp then
    12-05-2011 , 06:42 PM
    I would say first look his range should be something like this :

    22+,A2s+,K6s+,Q8s+,J8s+,T9s,A7o+,K9o+,QTo+,JTo


    so top 26 % but maybe even wide not sure. too lazy to put this into ICM atm

    Last edited by Name Changed; 12-05-2011 at 06:49 PM.
    12-05-2011 , 10:56 PM
    Even if his shoving range is exceptionally narrow here (88+ ATs+), this is still a pretty sick snap call even given ICM and what not . And like the others said - He is most likely shoving most pairs and down to mid aces and the better broadways and stuff.

    If they all shipped in front of you, it would get interesting in my opinion

    gl
    12-06-2011 , 12:15 AM
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Ssick_one
    snapcall and high five monitor.
    +1

          
    m