Quote:
Originally Posted by DonSwanLeon
The following is an opinion, the main reason an affiliate can be paid quicker is because an online casino/poker pays the affiliate from a different account than player funds. At the end of the month, they tally the rake and pay a percentage of the money from an operating expense account.
"Operating expense account" is just a construct Shane (or his paymaster) uses to try to explain away why Lock is able to pay its staff and business partners on time but not its players. The reality is that all money Lock has comes from players. Whether or not it goes through an intermediate account has no impact on the ability to process transactions quickly. (If it was that easy then they could simply set up an "Operating expense account B" for paying out players. If Lock pays affiliates quicker than regular players then the reason is that they choose to do so.
Shane, please answer the unanswered questions itt:
(1) Why did you imply that OP was manipulator/scammer when you later admitted you had no evidence of that?
(2) Please link one example of the forum-based manipulation you refer to.
(3) Why do you think one more person saying Lock is busto makes any difference when there are tonnes doing so already?
(4) Why are affiliates given faster cashout times than the rest of your customers?
(5) Do you agree with economics 101, supply-demand relationships?
(6) If Lock has the money then why do you care if players make transfers?
(7) Why do you accept withdrawals but then cancel them a month later (instead of rejecting them immediately if your made up "case by case" requirements aren't satified)?