Quote:
Originally Posted by suppersready
what almost everyone in this forum doesnt understand is that the opinions of this forum come a from a very small percentage of users.
I and a lot of 2+2 users understand a lot more than you think.
1. Every day we see new users coming here and saying the same thing as all of us have, that they keep getting the runaround from Lock when they email asking them about anything.
2. Only a small percentage of poker players are actual winners and can cashout. The large majority of players are losing players that keep depositing and will never even have the opportunity to withdraw, let alone deal with these disgusting wait times.
3. Generally, if you are a winning player online, then you've heard of 2+2 or at least one of the dozens of other poker boards that have been discussing Lock's issues.
4. This really isn't even debatable. Lock is a horridly run poker room and casino. The software, cashouts, customer support and management decisions are all far below the standard of what we have been used to all these years. It's clear Lock has no intentions to improve and why would they if people keep depositing despite Lock doing everything possible to chase players off.
5. Lock's business model seems to be to attract new players and all but disregard existing players. Comcast had a similar business model until there were more choices and customers began jumping ship. They are now much better to existing customers, but it took competition to right that ship. It will take pretty much the same thing for Lock to change as well, as it's clear Jennifer Larson doesn't care at all.
6. Jennifer Larson did an interview well over a year ago where she stated Lock poker would be a place for true grinders to play. She was going against the grain of the industry in this regard, as most sites put more into recreational players than grinders. She also talked about all these new innovations she was coming up with for Lock poker, yet there have been ZERO new, innovative things at Lock, ZERO. In fact, they can't even get the standard things right, let alone incorporate anything new.
As it turns out, Jennifer has done the exact opposite of what she said in those early days. She can't be trusted with anything she says, as she's already been proven to completely misrepresent her company and her intentions with the company.
Last edited by poguemahone1; 01-25-2013 at 10:31 PM.
Reason: added #6