I didnt even read that article. I am just going by what others have been saying about it and that is good enough for me.

I clicked that link, saw the baby and just was like " WTF is this? " and clicked back to 2p2.

Until today, I didnt even hear of any site g911, which is weird, but I do wish I could have kept it that way.

Well said SGT and I am sure most of us could not agree more!

g911 and lock is a perfect match (in hell)

1. What the frack is g911?

2. I don't believe you when you say pros paid their airfare.

3. Successful operators!?! LOL! Lock Poker? Successful? LOL! C'mon man! There are people that have been waiting 6 months for a check! There are people that have been waiting 4 months for a WU withdrawal. Are these signs of successful operators?

4. You point to the fact that people that requested WU withdrawals in april have already been paid as a sign that things are getting better. Well I think people getting paid that requested in April before people that requested in January is a sign of disfunction and incompetence within lock poker.

Hi Chris. Last time you were on these forums I asked if you could disclose your relationship with Lock, and you replied that Lock was just a flat-fee advertiser with you and you were otherwise unaffiliated.

It's surprising then to hear you know intricate details of Lock's operation, like how long ago they booked a Portuguese hotel, who paid for airfare, etc.

Hello Chris,

Congratulations on your biased, inaccurate journalism and showing you have no soul by shucking off the players that have gone through hell. You've single handedly created a great opportunity for other news sites to slam you as there isn't a shred of evidence to anything you've just mentioned.

Actually, I sincerely doubt you have a single shred of evidence backing up any of the drivel you just presented. SHOW US THE PROOF OF OTHER PLAYERS CASHING OUT THROUGH WU AND TAKING WEEKS. SHOW US THE PROOF THAT EVERY PRO PAID OUT OF POCKET AND DIDN'T GET CHARGED WITH PLAYER MONEY. Additionally, what 'telltale' signs might there be showing that Lock isn't going under? What experience do you have looking at the accounting history of internet companies and online sites about to go under to accurately give such a stupid pathetic statement? And since you are so knowledgeable about Lock's solvency and have access to their accounts, why don't you start answering the hard questions that plague us all?

If you spent less time abetting a criminal organization and more time helping take them down like the scoundrels they are, you might have got more foot traffic to that POS site you own. But again... queue the golf clap... good job showing how soulless you are by the statement you just made and how much of a joke you are as a human being.

Nice try with your attempt to try and fool a group of people who time and time again band together to successfully uncover the truth through a long history of scandals. When Lock is indicted, I hope you get served one too as you are blatantly trying to further conspiracy to commit fraud.

P.S. The poker players aren't as stupid as you make them out to be. Have fun with your chest slapping. I do believe you will one day be successful on your conquest to bite your own ear though.

Cheers,

and by cheers I of course mean **** you

You know that's not what support means right? You were asked to only speak about support issues and not to post promotions. That simply means no promotions, what it does not mean is that you can pick and choose which posts you reply to and simply ignore the posts that would make you respond in a manner further than simply "Email Lock Security" Support doesn't mean you only answer some questions. All it means is that you can't do promotions. You and Lock really need to get it together.

The current and final status of Lock:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yCp_jTXq_do

Can anyone clear something up for me? When Shane said that he was asked to come back, but only in a support function, does he mean that he was asked by Lock or 2+2? I've never really been quite clear on who asked him to leave and come back, etc. Not that it matters a great deal since apparently no one from Lock is going to say anything anyway, but I was just wondering.

Ya that part is confusing. I was assuming that he meant Lock asked him to comeback. If it was 2p2, and Lock support on here just completely abandoned ship after that 1 post by "Joesph," then it looks even worse lol. Still nothing but bad for Lock.

I had assumed it to mean that Lock had asked him to continue posting. But you are correct that it isn't really clear. I will be disappointed if Mason and Mat were the ones who asked for his return. But I guess we're stuck.

Can someone who mods this forum put NSFW on the link to a picture of a stillborn baby? Jesus.

Baby looks healthy to me

Back to the OP. Lock Poker is dodging again. They are running from the hard questions. It's a terrible habit that they have in not communicating with their players and partners.

bad communicating company = bad company

post #21


considering that Shane was claiming to be so careful with his words in the first paragraph . Was he also being careful or sloppy with his choice of words in his last paragraph. Is he admitting that check payouts aren't going to improve any time soon since he wants to know where he is likely to be for another couple of months.

give an ultimatum to lock. if they do not create a play through requirement to withdraw funds (or some alternative measure that will allow you to cash out) and return player funds by a certain date, we as players will forfeit all financial information we have on lock relating to bank accounts, transfers, checks, Western Union, Skrill, etc. to the government and allow them to prosecute the CEO and others in charge*

*by extension, pros who recruited other players will be firmly liable based on their paychecks etc. maybe this will incentivize them to actually do something

It wasn't us.

I think you might be mistaken.

"Aiding and abetting is an additional provision in United States criminal law, for situations where it cannot be shown the party personally carried out the criminal offense, but where another person may have carried out the illegal act(s) as an agent of the charged, working together with or under the direction of the charged party, who is an accessory to the crime."

ainal obv

Well

Perhaps you open a new thread, if you want to debate. Let's not derail this thread here.

For those not following ALL the Lock threads (understandable as there are like 7 of them now spread across this forum and NVG), two emails were posted in the main NVG thread yesterday confirming that transferred funds cannot be withdrawn, with NO specification of a play through requirement.

One did state, however, that winnings can be withdrawn. Success!

Heads up for rollz?

It's play money, so sure, why not?

But seriously, I do not have money on Lock. I'm merely an observer from that perspective, albeit one who is just generally outraged at how badly players are being treated.

I know. Just some gallows humor. However I'm half serious if my check gets canceled

the ultimate irony is that their xfer policy is going to encourage more chip dumping, not less

I'm not at all sure that isn't part of their plan to seize funds.

They can start closing down accounts and confiscating funds due to chip dumping and boost their obviously empty coffers, maybe giving an appearance of solvency.