Shane, some questions for you to answer please - Page 2 - Two Plus Two

They still do have a lot of players with large balances on the site, even if those players may not actually be playing there anymore. They haven't run yet because the longer they can keep delaying payouts while keeping the site open, the longer they can keep collecting deposits, and they will probably continue to do so until whatever half-ass agency that regulates them finally pulls their license, at which point the owners will vanish and you'll never see Shane post here again.

THIS

... and kahn's post was spot-on, as well.

Lock has been broke since they lost their money in the Cyprus banks in 2012.

Ever since then, it's been cover-up mode, attempting to convince suckers to keep depositing under false pretenses.

04-30-2013 , 03:36 AM

#27

Kenny S

adept

Join Date: Sep 2010 Posts: 1,183

Quote:

Originally Posted by imjustshane

1. Checks are problematic at the best of times, right now they are even worse as evidenced by check problems across multiple sites and networks. I have kept you cashout on my priority list and continue to take it up with the cashier manager but I have no specific update yet.

How do you live with yourself? If Lock didn't give you a pay check for 4 1/2 months it would be higher up on my priority list than this guys cash out is on yours.

04-30-2013 , 05:57 AM

#28

imjustshane

Lock Poker Representative

Join Date: Mar 2011 Posts: 2,661

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kilowatt

Lock has never banked in Cyprus and the collapse in Cypress was 2013 not 2012.

04-30-2013 , 11:54 AM

#29

jackaaron

old hand

Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 1,560

This is just an alternative thought...

Cash outs are difficult because of a different reason...They may be unable to "collect" $$ for deposits that are being made, but don't want to tell anyone because if you can't deposit there, why would you even come there anew?

As a result, they're "floating" a lot of people in hopes that some of that money comes through eventually, and not all of it really is which is breaking them.

Obviously, I have no evidence to support this whatsoever, just pure spec, just wanted to throw that alternative out there.

04-30-2013 , 11:59 AM

#30

MsBartz

newbie

Join Date: Jul 2012 Posts: 38

Quote:

Originally Posted by FatalFlaws

1. Why is it that neither you nor anyone else are able to give me any kind of an update/realistic time frame regarding my over 4.5 month old check withdrawal?

2. Don't you think that this is the least that Lock could do as a simple courtesy to it's players that have been waiting this long for their withdrawals?

3. Why do I need to start a thread just to get a response from you, why don't you respond to emails that I send?

And just as an add on I have another 6 week old WU withdrawal that I haven't even gotten senders info for yet.

Well, since Shane is refusing to respond, I will try and help you out with some answers.

1. Because you will be lucky to receive it at all.
2. Yes it is. But when the money is not there, what do you want?
3. Again, because this is not a correctly ran business.

Any other questions?

Last edited by MsBartz; 04-30-2013 at 12:06 PM.

05-01-2013 , 03:42 AM

#31

spectralradius

grinder

Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 515

Quote:

Originally Posted by kahntrutahn

The Current Processing Abilities of Lock's Competitors:

The slowest checks would be the Jazette Cashier covering most of the Merge Gaming Network. Those checks come in 6-8 weeks and are queue-able wherein subsequent checks come 10-14 days later. Thus, your slowest paying competitor in the US market could pay out (at 2.5k per check max) at least 7 checks in the amount of 17.5k USD in the time the OP is complaining about, 4.5 months.

On the fast end there would be Intertops, who shares the same network as you. Intertops, in 4.5 months at 3k max per check, would be able to send out TWENTY checks in the total amount of 60k USD.

In the middle are sites like WPN and Bovada who could bang out something in the neighborhood of 24k USD and 33k USD respectively in a 4.5 month timeframe via check (both have larger and faster options as well).

----

Now, are we all still supposed to believe this is a processing issue? Or perhaps, more likely, that your company is an insolvent Ponzi Scheme? And please don't feed me any BS about how big Lock is and how this is the issue... Lock is not any larger than Jazette cashier and it is substantially smaller than Bovada.

--
Kahn

kind of interesting that shane has this wonderful habit of ignoring the posts that completely prove something he posts to be false (checks are a bad option, says shane) and keeps os posting stupid one-liners ..

idiot shane look for the nearest tall building and jump off it ASAP

Page 2 of 2

First

1 2

Last

...

Page 2 of 2

First

1 2

Last