Right. So their only gain is not having to move money to other skins anymore. But for their bottomline, i still don't see how it's any good. It's NOT THEIR money they're having to reconcile, it's PLAYER'S money, that's exactly my point. So their only gain is.. not having to go through the process/undertaking of having to ship those funds, sure, given the amount of money involved, that may actually be a real task/undertaking, but it does NOT affect their bottomline in a positive way ever, infact it'll only ever affect them negatively, because, as i said before, RAKE is the only revenue of a site (unless someone can point me out what else? I don't see it? Intrest on the player's money at the bank maybe?) Less players to play against = less tables going = less rake paid.
.. see my point? can anyone explain me what's their GAIN in this? Yes, you've told me the reconcilliation, i get that, i DON'T get how it matters to them however since again, it's player's money, not theirs. So.. if it does matter to them, then they're doing something really wrong.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ditch Digger
There's also the problem of some skins having higher percentages of high stakes winners.
Basically this isn't a valid argument at all imo, i don't see how a site at any network would care in the least where the money ever goes. Oh, actually, i can think of ONE single reason: the payment processor once again. More losing players means more deposits on your skin/site. Since every deposit means a ~10% cost of the deposit for the site, making people deposit less effectively does cut in their costs.
Man, all of this looks like such a giant mess imo.. I really can't fathom any of it tbh, i'm sooo curious on what the truth is behind all of this..