Quote:
Originally Posted by frommagio
That's a pretty awesome thread over there. On page 8, a new poster named LuckyDude challenged the moderator (dakota-xx) about how using connections to set up a different withdrawal line effectively allows some to cut in front of others. But in response, the moderator made a strong argument for how their site had accepted Lock advertising, that people had deposited based on that endorsement, and consequently they felt a responsibility to do anything they could to help expedite cashouts for their members. Furthermore, the moderator isn't absolving Lock from blame.
And it looks like they've been able to make things happen somehow - cashouts are happening for those folks. Somehow this moderator seems to have a key contact, but s/he claims it's not a Lock person.
However, they're still accepting Lock advertising, which is pretty bad. Someone will be left holding the bag.
CardsChat advertising is pretty ridiculous when it comes to informing potential players about real world cashout times. For a long time they had Lock and Carbon listed as 2 weeks or less. Cake at 3 weeks, all sorts of silly things that were off by a mere (minimum) factor of 4.
It makes sense for Lock to expedite CC though. CC has to be one of their bigger affiliates, and responsible for bringing in a good number of recreational players. In order to keep a Ponzi scheme alive, the Ponzi needs fresh money. The type of player CC brings in are dead money for the most part as opposed to 2+2'ers, which, very likely are net winners on the whole.
--
Kahn