The new rule came into effect on Saturday.

lol, a 17 page thread with no validity and hasn't been locked yet, yup must be stupid.

Next you should run into a hospice a scream how healthy you are.

Imagine they stop p2p transfers I'd laugh my **** off...get your money off now..or everyone stops playing to allow for 0 rake until they fix their **** . That would cause a stir.

Lock no rake strike!

Spam ever table on chat! No money no rake!


Pitchforks AHHh

im real tired atm some one plx tell shane if he want to show me its real simple clear pay outs from last year. I have big problem with lock players from 2012 who still haven't been cashed out. don't treat these ppl like there in a black hole there in cash out thread this should be your top pripty. I know you throw drts at board of players who get paid but plz clear nov dec and jan. I know they may not matter to you but they do to me, ducy if not I will see at wsop .

ROFL gee mate, thanks for the tip. I'm sure nobody ever considered doing that

Make sure bet is escrowed as these thieves would never pay up once they disappear.

WHY IS EVERYONE LYING DOWN???? I FEEL GREAT

Perhaps as a courtesy to the other players who have been waiting 20 weeks for their cashouts, you could leave your money in your Lock account until the rest of us have a chance to get our money off the site. Then, GRIND FOR GLORY to your heart's content!

Hello shane I have a straight forward question for you, If you could have it answered that would be swell. I back players on Lock, I don't actually play there myself, Im from Canada, will I ever be able to get my $?????

Awesome. You can send me 80% of my current balance via Western Union, MoneyGram, or a MoneyPak; when you do so, Lock can take my full poker wallet there and give it to you as a bonus then.

I don't think I have more than $340 left there, so I'll just take the $270 flat for it and you can keep the extra $2.

PM me for details! Will post when received!

Shane does not perform well under the pressure of straight forward questions. He tends to ignore them. Please rephrase it in a more combative nature so that he can reply in kind while not actually providing any useful information at all.

<3 this

Yes arrangements are still bring made for legitimate staking affiliates.

I can also confirm that after speaking to the security team there is definitely not a blanket ban on accounts receiving tranfers cashing out. All of these situations are being monitored on a case by case basis, and security have still asked anyone with questions to contact them directly.

whew I was worried there for a second, thank God you have the best security people in the biz

So I guess I will try a test cash out to see if I have been flagged?? Or is there someone who actually knows the answer??. Or is it a case by case basis?? The uncertainty doesn't sit well, I'm sure you can see why. It seems you guys are just trying to force good raking players no alternative but to go elsewhere?

It really took you guys a week of meetings to come up with something as vague as this? Why not just come out and say this right away.

ahahahahaahahahahaahahahahaahahahahaahahahahaahaha hahaahahahahaahahahahaahahahahaahahahahaahahahahaa hahahahaahahahahaahahahahaahahahahaahahahahaahahah ahaahahahahaahahahahaahahahahaahahahahaahahahahaah ahahahaahahahahaahahahahaahahahahaahahahahaahahaha haahahahahaahahahahaahahahahaahahahahaahahahahaaha hahahaahahahahaahahahahaahahahahaahahahahaahahahah aahahahahaahahahahaahahahahaahahahahaahahahahaahah ahahaahahahahaahahahahaahahahahaahahahahaahahahaha ahahahaha

There you go Shane a couple chances for you to demonstrate your faith in Lock and show up all the non-believers.

I actually don't think that post by Shane is vague at all. Is Shane supposed to have the case-by-case result of every individual account? He's not the one making the case-by-case decisions so I don't see how him directing everyone to security is unacceptable. That's just my opinion, but I really don't see how you can argue with me there either.

Agreed, why not just actually take the advice and call or email them rather than go through a test cashout.

your joking right? First off how the **** are you supposed to call them, secondly people are emailing them, and have updated multiple times that they have been, it's hard to hold a conversation though when the other end never responds read the threads before you post your ignorant ****.

It wasn't that I don't think they're not responding to e-mails quickly when I said that. It's just that I don't think Shane's post was vague at all and that their response to that post wasn't something like "when we e-mail them they do nothing, since that doesn't work can I PM you about my personal situation and you contact the people who I'm supposed to e-mail for me, and then get back to me". It was "Shane that was vague" when it really wasn't.

If Shane isn't willing to contact security for people who PM him on an individual basis when security doesn't answer in a timely manner, then that's a bit odd, but I'm guessing he's either A) willing to do that or B) isn't allowed to do it for some reason. If B is the case then it's not really his fault.

And if Shane doesn't reply to PMs quickly either then it's probably because security isn't getting back to him, which is the same as them not getting back to you, which yes is unacceptable but it's still not his fault. And since it's not his fault, that's why I think his post was 100% okay.

He said if you're a backer Lock is willing to make arrangements with you to cash out. He said there's not a blanket ban. He said it's case-by-case. That IMO obviously means you request a cashout and if you're clearly buying up Lock funds at .5 they're not gonna let you cashout (which I actually don't agree with or think makes sense, but it is what it is). If you aren't then you're fine and can cash out. If that's not what that means then I guess I'm totally wrong here but I'd bet Shane will agree that's what he meant.

His post is vague because its the same garbage he already said prior to his "meeting" and its in direct conflict with both the information being dispensed by Lock csr and Lock's actions. If this is truly on a case by case basis you don't just blanket stop cashouts of people who've transferred and make everyone jump thru these hoops, you target only the specific cases in question.

This is being done and people are getting nowhere and in most cases simply ignored.