lol "Cypress"

Yes, I did.

IPs on this new account do not share any IPs with any other account (including Shane's).

Regardless, site reps need to be verified and I expect that will happen relatively soon.

Any amount of actual content at all would be warmly received by many, including me. None of us would be "satisfied" per se because we still dont have our money. But many of us our willing to take what we can get in terms of any improvements just incommunication, clarification, and an end to the idiotic vagueness in practically every single thing they say.

No content = Whoa, Really? That was worthless...and now you left.

Any proof of solvency would almost stop 95% of the negative posts and bad mouthing. If a company is not willing to assure the players of this and allowing the negative press and rumours to run rampant, then how is anyone to believe anything other than they are broke?! If a poster came on here posting lies about anyone of us, we would all jump thru hoops to discredit the accusations! Why will lock not do the same? Only one answer as far as im concerned. Im a hands on person and only way im buying it is to see proof. You can have the lord almighty come on here and SAY they have our money but im not drinking the kool aid

There is a "Joseph Stone"
http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...37&postcount=1

Joseph, is your last name Stone?

Does anyone know of any reason I can't get to the second page (posts 101-) of this thread?

Hmm. Posting this reply allowed me to get there (here). Anyone ever have that happen before. BTW, there were no issues with other threads.

+1

It's probably because of deleted posts.

Log out and clear your internet cache.

Or adjust to 50 PPP.

Really?! The quote below was just posted in the other thread here.

Also Broseph you talk about the transfer issue but make no mention of the huge delays for everybody receiving their money now and before there were "transfer" issues. Show us the money!

I read this as we have the funds to pay out many of you now that we have stolen large amounts of money from people who used a p2p transfer.

/cynical

Can someone tell me if this has been answered please. If Lock knew there was abuse of p2p transfers why did they just not stop them altogether? To me the transfer/withdraw issue was simply an excuse to keep money on the site knowing players would continue to play and generate rake for the site. Having money lost on AP I have the same feeling now as I did then that the site was about to go bellyup.

lol maybe players are "abusing" the transfer option to get their money off your site since they can't cash out in a timely manner? None of this "transfer abuse" would be happening if lock could get withdrawal times closer to what other US facing sites process theirs at (Bodog, WPN, Intertops, etc)

Please stop giving players the excuse "lock is too big and we have more player withdrawals to process then everyone else" you need to adjust and adapt accordingly to be able to keep up with player demand if you're going to continue to operate.

The lies and deflection need to stop if lock wants to be taken seriously. Get rid of Larson, hire new support & developers, train your staff better, find better processing and get your **** together guys.

Obviously, the welcome wagon would have been a bit more civil if Joseph hadn't swooped in like a seagull, deposited his post on the Lock Forum's windshield, and flown away. I think it's pretty outrageous that 100+ posts later, we still don't know if we're being trolled (by Joseph, I mean).

ETA: If Lock had the ability to provide that clarification you (and I) so desperately seek, their ads would still be running over there --->

That does not mean anything, when he's got Deutsche Telekom as his isp, then everytime you disconnect your internet connection you will get a new IP-address and since Telekom has a after-24-hours-we-disconnect-you-once-policity you will have always a new ip

Sent from my HTC Desire using 2+2 Forums

Definitely have to agree here. Bovada has more cash players than Lock and cashes out very quickly.

If the processor is the issue then you have to find a better way to cash players out, or eventually you will lose business.

Pretty important... unless of course you're just running a Ponzi scheme.

I know it's not definitive. All I do is check the IPs. There are other people (who actually get paid to work for 2p2) that verify site reps.

Anyone can write a well worded 'request' of lock so that Joseph is clear on what we are asking for? I suggest we +1 it until they answer...

Good Job lock!

By not allowing anybody who received a player transfer to withdraw you do get less cash outs and less liability. Also cash outs amounts will probably be a lot smaller since I don't think the recreational players are doing player transfer or are aware of 2+2 poker chips trading thread.

You run a nice Ponzy and now you are stealing the regulars.

Yes your cash out times will improve if all your regular players can't cash out a penny.

Whats worst is that there is probably just the owners of Lock who know they don't have the funds. Security is probably getting some lies from them. Welcome Joseph!

At least Full Tilt Poker had a good software...

i mean some ppl are posting requesting shane never post again, others are posting this.
make up yer minds, mob

Yeah, he's been on several times since the original post in the other thread started by 2+2. Once was to get rid of the promotional stickies in the sub forum although its anyones guess (as with everything Lock related) why all the other times.

thanks for that Sgt RJ

I'd guess most of us didn't think these conditions would be met in any meaningful way, but I sort of thought they'd at least pretend for a little while that they were making some effort to meet them.

Well, I think everyone would agree that some sort of definitive state would be best. Whether Shane is no longer a rep for Lock on here or whether he will be helping out this other possible rep would be something that could be easily stated by Shane. This stalling/floating by from Lock is only negative in the eyes of Lock players and/or those looking to get paid. Lock Security and Reps have stated that they frequently view this forum and are aware of what is going on...yet these "information blitz's" from Lock have always failed to deliver any substantial information to dispose of negative notions of Lock. Lock responded to 2+2 Admins and gave off the impression that it was ready to bring out a new responsive rep and handle some of the current issues in a timely manner. Yet again people are left wandering around in the dark hoping that at the very least someone flicks on a light so they can get out of this. Doesn't say anything good about Lock that they allow that to continue.

yeah this is pretty accurate IMO. this doesn't even qualify as trying. not even a little.

If they haven't responded yet, I doubt they have any answers for us to the questions in the thread. I'd expect posts from them to be vague, and very rare.

I'm thinking out loud here: Has anyone thought that if Lock Poker has no banners on 2+2, that they don't have to answer any questions now? Now because they have nothing more to gain (deposits) they can let us speculate amongst ourselves. It may be time to take to their social streams Facebook and Twitter and keep the pressure up (more than people have done).