Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Lock Shady Practices 101 Lock Shady Practices 101

05-07-2013 , 01:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by durrrr
the audit part isn't completely accurate. appreciated what i learned in the rest of the post tho, ty.

is there anything a touch more certain? it seems to me to be above 90% that there is a lot of shadiness going on at lock and likely they dont have the players money, but since I'm sponsored by a competing site im hesitant to tweet/talk about it. however it also seems that if i did tweet/talk about it it would likely save innocent people a bit of money (however if i was wrong i could miss a future spot to save ppl more etc).
I think this is something that non 2+2 members need to know about such as poker fans who follow you, but I can also dilemma. It does seem though that there is overwhelming evidence of foul play or horrible customer communication/support, and even if it's the latter of the two they deserve to be outed in some way...

Last edited by Coldcard; 05-07-2013 at 01:48 PM.
05-07-2013 , 01:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MerginHosOn24s
none of the pros should be worried about Lock going down and smearing their reputations....none of the FTP pros caught flack besides the ones who were deeply involved in the actual running of the company.

nobody really holds Helmuth to the fire for being with UB either...except for the people who hate him already.

sadly the world is filled with people who are selfish/completely self serving and its hard to blame them...while its noble and righteous to be selfless it doesnt help pay the bills or secure the livelihood of loved ones. sounds great in principal but in the real world you need to be rather selfish to get anywhere and avoid being trampled and used by others..
I think most of the lock pros would be just fine financially without the sponsorship deal.. but people who are waiting for their money and aren't wealthy already and could used the stuck money for family needs..

maybe im naïve thinking these huge names in poker that got a lock deal would do the ethical thing and say something isn't right here..
05-07-2013 , 01:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MerginHosOn24s

what happens if everyone in this thread is wrong and Lock actually ends up fixing things and gets back on track?
Ummm, that would be nice, and the result that we all want, but are we supposed to just ignore the fact that this whole ordeal happened at all if they correct things? They owe us explanations, answers, apologies, etc. When it's all said and done you can't just pretend you didn't have a long period of time where you weren't paying players their funds and also freezing transferred funds at your discretion.

No one is going to forget this, regardless of how it turns out. They should be more concerned with their image and the opinions of their customers than they are. And that is such an understatement.
05-07-2013 , 03:18 PM
If by some amazing fluke it turns out we were all wrong and Lock has been solvent this entire time, it's still their fault.

If that's the case, they created this situation by their terrible customer service and nonsensical policies that made it look like they were broke.

Similarly, if you wear the same clothes for 20 years, barely shower, and never shave, you can't be insulted when people assume you're homeless, even if you have 10 million dollars in the bank and live in a mansion.
05-07-2013 , 05:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by durrrr
the audit part isn't completely accurate. appreciated what i learned in the rest of the post tho, ty.

is there anything a touch more certain? it seems to me to be above 90% that there is a lot of shadiness going on at lock and likely they dont have the players money, but since I'm sponsored by a competing site im hesitant to tweet/talk about it. however it also seems that if i did tweet/talk about it it would likely save innocent people a bit of money (however if i was wrong i could miss a future spot to save ppl more etc).
As far as I can tell, things are in that grey zone just like FTP in the beginning - the site isn't giving real answers, so the players only have the evidence they can see (lack of payment, lack of answers) to use in forming their opinions.

I can certainly understand and respect your dilemma.

If you were to do anything, I would just ask that you ask people to check out one of the main threads and make sure they are aware that there are possible issues before deciding to deposit on Lock. If we can prevent any more new players from getting drawn in, I think that's a worthy goal.

If Lock somehow sorts itself out, it's always easy enough to follow up at a later date with something like: Glad to see Lock has made things right for their customers!

Always respected your willingness to stand up for the players during the FTP debacle, within your abilities.
05-07-2013 , 07:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by HaseebQ
Well, there's no site that won't accept tons of deposit money, that doesn't say anything about its flexibility. We didn't deposit 100k on an account to chipdump it to Jose. That's why we created an account with a joke name--we never expected to use it. We thought we would deposit, transfer, end of story. But when it told us we couldn't transfer the 100k to him, we had to figure out some other way to get it to him.
Wait a second. So you are trying to tell us that you actually attempted and were declined transferring the 100K directly into Girah's account and then you end up losing it all just a short while later at highstakes HU games to that very same person and Lock wasn't the least suspicious that it was a chip dump.

I have to be missing something here.
05-07-2013 , 07:22 PM
It was almost the perfect crime...
05-07-2013 , 07:53 PM
You're not missing anything, Mike.

He expects us to believe that because it was so obvious, that means they knew nothing about the challenge and it was all just a huge misunderstanding.

Although that doesn't explain how they figured they'd explain an obvious chip dump to their horse, but I assume they would just tell Lock security that it was just a player transfer behind reputable high stakes regs and all those pesky rules that lesser mortals have to deal with would just be swept aside.
05-08-2013 , 12:30 AM
Why is the casino bonus issue/scandal missing from the OP?

Also not really shady, but yet more broken promises... anyone remember lockops?
...and the promised native mac software?
05-08-2013 , 01:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MerginHosOn24s
none of the pros should be worried about Lock going down and smearing their reputations....none of the FTP pros caught flack besides the ones who were deeply involved in the actual running of the company.

nobody really holds Helmuth to the fire for being with UB either...except for the people who hate him already.

sadly the world is filled with people who are selfish/completely self serving and its hard to blame them...while its noble and righteous to be selfless it doesnt help pay the bills or secure the livelihood of loved ones. sounds great in principal but in the real world you need to be rather selfish to get anywhere and avoid being trampled and used by others.

what happens if everyone in this thread is wrong and Lock actually ends up fixing things and gets back on track? if pros listened to people on these forums they'd end up burning bridges with Lock, of which there would be no going back....
keep in mind they are being told by people inside the company that things are OK and will be better soon! i highly doubt any of these pros would be so naive and clueless if they had ANY real inclination or evidence of real, tangible problems at Lock(no matter how obvious it may seem to us...its still speculation).

I mean even if the company was going under or suffering from major issues....would they REALLY be telling their site pros(who bring in tons of new players/deposits) or drop hints of financial problems while popping champagne bottles on their escapades in Portugal?

i think the majority of people are angry and rightfully so, but I also believe you are attacking the wrong people....i do agree that actively promoting the site while the situation is so volatile/unclear is shady and def looks immoral.

however we aren't aware of their obligations/contract with Lock and maybe they have little choice but to post twitter/facebook promos and attract referrals. either way its still their decision and choice...they could make it clear in other ways they are deeply concerned with the issues at Lock without damaging their reputation and relationship with the company in irreparable ways.
this, honestly, is totally besides the point. where is the freakin communication between the company and the customer? there has been zero transparency and absolutely no reassurance that ANYTHING is ok. The pros are enabling this behavior.
05-08-2013 , 03:10 PM
funny how haseeb always runs out of internets when people start asking questions.....
05-08-2013 , 03:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by durrrr
also im not much of a haseeb fan at all, he always kind've annoyed me, and seemed pretty scummy in the girah scandal, but he comes off as pretty geniune to me in this thread, and is likely providing some fairly valuable information. just my 2c
srsly? doubt what hes saying makes any sense...instead of just shipping 100k to their horse (which seems pretty ******ed anyway, who sends a 5/10 horse 100k???)

they created a "joke account" deposited 100k and chip dumped, but made it look like a real game to fool security, tho security will very easily be able to tell the accounts have history, since obv the "joke account" had attempted to transfer girah heaps.

Im sure most people who actually read the posts DIH made see the holes.

As soon as he backs himself into a corner with his non-sensical explanations his internet magically disappears
05-08-2013 , 03:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Johnson
Wait a second. So you are trying to tell us that you actually attempted and were declined transferring the 100K directly into Girah's account and then you end up losing it all just a short while later at highstakes HU games to that very same person and Lock wasn't the least suspicious that it was a chip dump.

I have to be missing something here.
I think you are over-estimating Lock's internal communication, competence, and probably motives.
05-08-2013 , 04:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by HaseebQ
These are just not true. For one, it was at NL, not PLO. Second, he had played 25/50 before, but his main game was 5/10. Third, as a high stakes player, the idea that a 5/10 player playing heads up with someone at 25/50 is rare or indicative of chipdumping is just completely wrong. To put it narratively, it would be believable that he would be more likely to take shots on the last day of the challenge. Because poker is a game of probabilities and chaos, things like this are inherently difficult to prove. The real indictment is the margin by which he beat the 2nd place player, and yes, that it occurred on the final day.

You are right that what took place would, to a competent observer, look shady. But chipdumping is an indictment that cannot be made without unequivocal proof. That's my point. Not that it doesn't look shady--it obviously does, and like I said, if I actually wanted to chipdump, doing it all in one day on one session with such fantastic timing is profoundly stupid.

My point is that there was no proof. Keep in mind, chipdumps are generally punished with confiscation of funds or account closures. And what counts as proof of chipdumping by the poker community is a very different standard compared to what counts as proof of chipdumping by a poker security department. While 2p2 may have readily made that indictment, LockPoker has a much higher burden of proof.



I originally claimed that it was me in a Bluff Interview to try to deflect any blame from Jungle. Jungle later admitted to be the one who was actually playing on Girah's account during his interview with 2p2. I never actually played on anyone else's account.

If you read the final summary threads about the Girah scandal, they point this out as one of my key lies.


If this is true, I was completely unaware of it. After the Bluff Challenge blew up, I was watching 2p2 closely, and I never heard anything at all about suspicions of chipdumping--in fact, just the opposite. The overwhelming sentiment on 2p2 was one of sympathy for Girah. If this was going on on another site then I'd be unaware of it, but this definitely wasn't happening widely on 2p2.

This charge also wasn't raised until very late in the Girah scandal itself, around the same time that our involvements as his backer became public.

In short, you could be right. I don't know. But I don't think that it was quite as vociferous as you are suggesting.

I do believe I have left the poker community, for what it's worth. I've not interacted with it for over a year and a half, after being a professional poker player over five years. My post history indicates why I recently created this account--but I no longer participate, nor am I generally welcomed.

I don't want to turn this into a fight. I don't want to be contentious, or seem like I don't believe I was in the wrong, or made mistakes, and I'm certainly no genius. I apologize for bringing this up, my only intention was to try to get the story straight amidst all the chaos of this situation. This thread is ultimately about Lock Poker and its various offenses against players, and I don't want to derail that. I'm not trying to defend Lock either--they are clearly a terribly run company, and are actively manipulating and lying to players, if not defrauding them outright. You're a good person for putting in all the effort you have to try to bring their practices to light and help poker players from unwittingly trusting this company. So your disrespect for me is both understandable and warranted.

Haseeb
ummmmm, didnt he win all the $$ at 100/200 not 25/50?
05-08-2013 , 11:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SGT RJ
You're not missing anything, Mike.

He expects us to believe that because it was so obvious, that means they knew nothing about the challenge and it was all just a huge misunderstanding.

Although that doesn't explain how they figured they'd explain an obvious chip dump to their horse, but I assume they would just tell Lock security that it was just a player transfer behind reputable high stakes regs and all those pesky rules that lesser mortals have to deal with would just be swept aside.
Ok he didnt know... Why a horse needs a 100k transfer? Holy **** what stakes was he going to play? 20kNL?
Almost worked lol.
05-09-2013 , 09:17 PM
omgomgomg romdom!

Last edited by leprous_hand; 05-09-2013 at 09:18 PM. Reason: itt!
07-07-2013 , 09:28 PM
We need to bring this thread back!
07-07-2013 , 09:43 PM
back in the good ole days when lock was worth .35-.4
07-07-2013 , 10:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NoChopNinja
back in the good ole days when lock was worth .35-.4
It's truly ridiculous. I have no idea what they're doing. They pay to keep Shane and this forum running, which is money that could be used to pay players. Even if they don't care about the players at all and simply want to maximize the money in their pocket, closing this forum would save them money. Literally almost every thread on the front page is a complaint. It's not benefiting them in any way.

I have never run a business in my life but truly believe I, or half the people on this forum, could do a better job than Lock is currently doing.
07-07-2013 , 10:32 PM
They aren't paying for this forum anymore.

2+2 has agreed to keep it open for the good of the players, and for Shane to assist players in a support role only (no promotions).

It's been like this since 2+2 pulled Lock's banner ads, iirc.

But yes, this forum has been an absolute disgrace for over a year now. No half competent business would allow it to stand like it is. It's amazingly inept.
07-07-2013 , 11:04 PM
Not to mention Shane continues to get paid by Lock Poker.. Haven't seen him post in days?!?!

You see all these other reps for different sites and softwares posting consistently and helping out the forum every day, they even apologise if they are going to be away and can't reply for the next 24hrs!!

*sigh* lock poker can't even choose an at least minimum satisfactory forum rep.. What chance do they have of running a poker room.
07-08-2013 , 07:23 PM
Lying to people on a daily basis must be draining, especially when you know they don't believe a word you are saying to them.
07-08-2013 , 08:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FT37
Not to mention Shane continues to get paid by Lock
Poker.
We will see for how long.....

Quote:
Originally Posted by FT37
Haven't seen him post in days?!?! You see all these other reps for different sites and softwares posting consistently and helping out the forum every day, they even apologise if they are going to be away and can't reply for the next 24hrs!! *sigh* lock poker can't even choose an at least minimum satisfactory forum rep.
This is actually a pretty significant point that people should be focusing on.
First, the fact that Shane only answers a few questions and then disappears for days indicates how important this role is to him. And second, the fact that his superiors do not seem to care if he is here and responds to posts ITT. When you basically have an individual and company that place this low a priority on customer service, it is extremely telling. They basically don't give a phuk about the customer, their reputation, or their business. Does that sound like a company that is in it for the long haul? Or a company that is winding things down before the doors close.......

      
m