Quote:
Originally Posted by PrimordialAA
out of curiosity, have you by chance asked any of the other US-facing sites to prove solvency?
The reality is that you have to ask all of them, especially Lock Poker.
Have you looked at the "license" that Lock Poker has that allows them to run their gambling business? It's nothing more than window dressing.
No where on that site is there any assurance of "player protection". If one could find it on there, any reasonable person wouldn't feel confident that the licensor had any power to do anything to stop Lock Poker from commingling player bankrolls with their expense account.
When you look at companies that do business in regulated environments, they are licensed by Malta, Alderney, Isle of Man and Gibraltar etc. all of the licensor websites give some type of "player protection".
The fact that Lock Poker accepts American players will not allow them to get a license from the above companies. So who does the consumer turn to? They turn to Lock Poker, they ask that they prove solvency. Lock Poker in turn blames the consumer for wanting to know if their money is protected.
Lock Poker is so slack when it comes to everything that even the Curaco License it holds is wrong. It's for LockPoker.com not LockPoker.eu
The reason it hasn't been corrected is because it's not a big deal, the Curaco License is meaningless anyway.
Lock Poker has so many bad habits, it's impossible for me to believe that they will survive doing business this way.