Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Haven
This trial structured system is to ensure that Shane gives an answer to certain questions posed in the sticky, and enables all users to read his answers quickly and easily, without having to wade through the dross and off-topic comments that almost inevitably appear in other threads. After a few days, it should become a kind of FAQ.
Can we first just be clear though and state that there's NOTHING ensuring Shane to actually answer these questions. There is a fine line between responding to a question and actually answering it. How often have ANY of us taken one of Shane's answers and actually been satisfied? Even if you're remotely satisfied just ONCE, you immediately have follow-up questions about his response, because something once again didn't add up. The short answer to that is RARELY. It's a RARE occurrence to feel like your question was actually answered properly and with the correct information.
The sad part is that we'd actually
settle for 4-5 week withdrawal times like they claim, and yet we can't even get those. What other questions need to be asked anymore? We've run around in circles. We've waited for improvement. We've been forced to listen to crap and sat quasi-patiently anyways. And for the person who posted above that says the data shows OLD wait times and not new wait times, that is true.. BUT, if Lock was suddenly paying out on a regular at even 4-5 weeks, Lock $ wouldn't be selling in the marketplace for .3 and lower these days. There aren't even a lot of BUYERS anymore at .3-.32, trust me I know, I've been looking for them.
In regards to Jah, I just meant that I think it's silly to have MULTIPLE threads relating to Questions (Discussions on the questions). Everything that was needed was incorporated in the Q&A thread, which has been LOCKed. If you want to spend free time on editing the layout of this forum, kudos. I am just personally giving you another opinion that it is in fact cluttering the forum and creating more confusion instead of less.
In all honesty, it is more work for you, and it is more work for viewers of the forums to go into multiple threads for discussions regarding topics already being presented in another thread. I'm not going to keep track of which questions are in which threads, so I'd continually have to check back to the thread "key" to find out which discussion thread I should be checking. I'd personally rather just scroll through 1 thread. I don't speak for anyone but myself, but it just seems like excess time usage and more thread clutter.