Quote:
Originally Posted by imjustshane
Quote:
Originally Posted by CwazyMonter
This statement is a problem. It is a microcosm of the overall problem the entire community has with Lock....Lock's lack of transparency. Simply put, the community never knows when Lock is:
(1) Being truthful,
OR
(2) "Deflecting"
OR
(3) "Directly Lying"
In this case my credibility was less important than the security of our owner and management team.
Your credibility is important because you are the public spokesman for Lock on 2+2.
Your credibility = Lock's credibility, especially when speaking about Lock-related matters.
So if you lie (which you blatantly did, regarding Portugal), that makes Lock a site managed by liars.
How do you not see this is a problem?
Oh, and can you point to a single controversy where Lock has been transparent and honest?
Lock lied about the Girah scandal.
Lock lied about the Casino Bonus scandal.
Lock still has not told the truth about the reason for the canceled cashouts. (How were active grinders singled out as "mule accounts"?)
Lock (you) lied about Portugal.
Lock lies about cashout times (see the support reps telling people "4-6 weeks" when cashouts were taking 4-5 months.)
Give me an example where Lock is credible.
I just gave you a lot of examples where Lock constantly lies.
I guess you're the perfect spokesman for them, since you seem to lie so often that I believe you actually get off on doing it.