Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry Legend
I actually disagree pretty strongly with part of what jj said there.
If someone is in a role they don't enjoy, and would much rather start working toward a different one that is more desirable, I want to know that the second they feel that way.
This is subtly different than what I think we were talking about. I want to know that too - but the advice was for someone within a few weeks to start asking for work that expands their role.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry Legend
Then I can get them working toward that goal and eliminate a ton of the worst issues there are in employing people and ultimately that will increase turnover and make your company worse.
Sure, definitely. But again, I'm not going to start giving a new hire work that isn't in their role until I know they're even capable of doing their current role.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry Legend
If it's a role like manual QA that is designed for literally anyone to be able to be competent, waiting for them to "prove" themselves just adds an arbitrary amount of time to their progression, and your company's progression.
One of the reasons startups are so successful in crushing legacy companies is because they eliminate these arbitrary time gates.
The whole concept of "proving yourself" in this context is just completely broken and wrong imo.
I disagree with this premise of why startups are successful. It has nothing to do with eliminating 'arbitrary time gates'. People can move up the career ladder quickly in startups BECAUSE they prove themselves and get rewarded with more work. Not because they just want to move up.
And people that get hired to do a role and then don't do that role because they're too busy looking for something better - aren't helping startups either.