Quote:
Originally Posted by General Tsao
Calling this book "history" is a huge stretch. It's political commentary, imo - and often good/accurate political commentary, but its author's bias leads to this book bordering on dishonesty.
Biased yes, but if anything, probably more honest than most people prefer. Zinn, in effect, grabs us by the scruff of the neck and rubs our noses in the **** we don't like to see and that gets too easily dismissed, denied, or minimized. Instead of writing history from the point of view of the victors, he turns this approach on its head and makes sure you know about what happened to the other side. That's what I like about it.
On the minus side, Zinn's utopian colors show through at times, which is a little annoying. He's critical of many political actions without really offering any kind of alternative. When he does offer a vague solution to a problem, he doesn't really address, in realistic way, what the consequences would be.
Overall, though, I think the positive outweigh the negatives. It is definitely in our interests as a nation not to forget the victims in the march of human progress. I fear that the information explosion of our age has, paradoxically, turned us increasingly into a nation of sheep being herded to the slaughterhouse. Information has become more confusing, manipulable, and we're collectively less equiped to exercise critical thinking than the typical 18th century farmer.
Last edited by HorridSludgyBits; 03-22-2011 at 09:15 AM.
Reason: typo