Quote:
Originally Posted by John Bontus
²
Look at his agression factors: they're very low until the river: where he has only two decisions left: fold or raise
Well this isn't true -- we've seen hand examples where this guy just simply called on the river when good.
if this guy was a cheater, he was much better than the AP superuser guy. As I've said before I don't know what to think, but I lean towards thinking something is fishy when considering ALL of the evidence, there is really not one piece of information that incriminates him.
I guess -what are the odds that some guy plays the best players on UB, runs at 60 bb/100+ over 3,000 hands playing 58/36 or whatever, makes some great plays, some horrible plays, doesn't run far above expectation, quits and withdraws his money, deletes his account, all around the same time another online poker site owned by the same parent company is experiencing the most infamous case of cheating ever seen in online poker?
tc