Quote:
Originally Posted by NoahSD
I'm not 100% sure about this, but I'm pretty sure that Stars's argument here is that they can't prove intention. Like it's possible that LittleZen said "I don't 3-bet Stox because I think he runs really good against me when I 3-bet him!" or something ******ed like that.
Ok, but what if you can prove that the initial raiser adapt his play by playing looser when his friend is on his left, knowing that he will not 3bet him.
The point is to investigate the initial raiser actions, not the insta-folder behind him.
In your example, LittleZen can say: "I don't 3-bet Stox because he runs good when I 3-bet him."; but what would be Stox reasons to adapt and play looser when LittleZen is on his left if not collusion?