Discussion of Durrrr challenge thread (former September **** thread) - Page 32 - High Stakes Poker Pot Limit and No Limit

I agree that analogies often hurt the discussion more than they help, but I disagree that bf changed the essence of the challenge and ask you to read this thread, because that was adressed by many people before.

09-26-2013 , 01:55 PM

#777

jalexand42

Hypothetical Ubermonkey

Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 5,378

I'm going to start temp banning people in this thread if they can't talk in a civil fashion without insults. Fair warning.

Also, if you don't have any direct skin in the game or have some compelling reason why you should be posting, you probably shouldn't be.

This discussion seems to be going nowhere in a hurry, maybe it should just be locked, barring some actual resolution/decision to any of this, which clearly isn't going to happen in this thread.

09-26-2013 , 02:02 PM

#778

Cinarocket

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Nov 2009 Posts: 14,132

http://www.pokerlistings.com/junglem...hallenge-54942

09-26-2013 , 05:05 PM

#779

cheehc

enthusiast

Join Date: May 2011 Posts: 77

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dandys Rule, OK?

Too much nuance for you.

Bettors can't have reasonably estimated that BF would have occurred during the course of the bets. Therefore, the bets are off.

Bettors could have reasonably included time constraints in the initial bets. They didn't. Therefore, the bets are on.

09-26-2013 , 05:22 PM

#780

theskillzdatklls

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 4,862

Viffer: Your whole argument about black friday doesn't even make sense. Dwan was dodging for several months before black friday occurred. If the challenge had taken at any remote pace that junglemand was willing to play at, it would have been finished before 4/15 ever hit if you want to keep using these types of arguments.

09-26-2013 , 05:24 PM

#781

viffer

old hand

Join Date: Jun 2003 Posts: 1,531

Quote:

Originally Posted by cheehc

Bettors could have reasonably included time constraints in the initial bets. They didn't. Therefore, the bets are on.

isa not berry smartz but i thinks you an idiot!!!

PLease show me a signed copy of the contract by both parties?

Anyways,

Justin is in process of choosing the arbitrators, id like to bet more on my opinion.

09-26-2013 , 05:25 PM

#782

viffer

old hand

Join Date: Jun 2003 Posts: 1,531

Quote:

Originally Posted by theskillzdatklls

WOULD OF COULD OF SHOULD OF, WHO CARES, doesnt involve me.

09-26-2013 , 05:26 PM

#783

viffer

old hand

Join Date: Jun 2003 Posts: 1,531

Quote:

Originally Posted by jungleman

lol, i really would like the bet to be legally enforceable or have any relevance to the law

You still have a chance!!!

09-26-2013 , 06:41 PM

#784

LucidDream

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 10,703

Quote:

Originally Posted by viffer

WOULD OF COULD OF SHOULD OF, WHO CARES, doesnt involve me.

you bet on the results of the challenge so while you weren't directly involved in the decision by durrrr to avoid jungle for many months, it still affects you.

09-26-2013 , 06:55 PM

#785

viffer

old hand

Join Date: Jun 2003 Posts: 1,531

Quote:

Originally Posted by LucidDream

you bet on the results of the challenge so while you weren't directly involved in the decision by durrrr to avoid jungle for many months, it still affects you.

IM willing to back my opinion up with money, and facts. Can we just bet on whose right?

Or you just going to say im wrong cause you say so?

09-26-2013 , 07:02 PM

#786

LucidDream

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 10,703

Quote:

Originally Posted by viffer

IM willing to back my opinion up with money, and facts. Can we just bet on whose right?

Or you just going to say im wrong cause you say so?

You want the judges to have as little info about the situation as possible and be people outside the poker world...that makes zero sense if you are trying to get a fair ruling. You aren't trying to get a fair ruling tho...you're trying to get a ruling in your favor.

Also, you were willing to back your opinion of durrrr's NL game vs Jungle w/ money too....we all see how that went. You're angle shooting to try to justify welching.

Haven't been following that close the past few pages...did you ever come to terms on your bet w/ ZeeJustin?

09-26-2013 , 07:43 PM

#787

viffer

old hand

Join Date: Jun 2003 Posts: 1,531

The more people insult me the more and more i believe im right, its there only defence. So are you saying if jungleman was to die tom would win? Cause jungleman forfiets?

09-26-2013 , 07:53 PM

#788

BreakYaNeck

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Oct 2008 Posts: 8,187

Quote:

Originally Posted by viffer

The more people insult me the more and more i believe im right, its there only defence. So are you saying if jungleman was to die tom would win? Cause jungleman forfiets?

No one died, your analogies are terrible.

09-26-2013 , 07:57 PM

#789

LucidDream

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 10,703

Quote:

Originally Posted by viffer

The more people insult me the more and more i believe im right, its there only defence. So are you saying if jungleman was to die tom would win? Cause jungleman forfiets?

Saying that you're angle shooting isn't insulting you, it's just making an observation...an observation that quite a few people in this thread have made as well.

Both players are still alive. Yet another argument made by you that holds no water whatsoever.

And the more you make these ridiculous arguments that in no way relate to the current situation the more I believe you're ignoring the facts not out of stupidity, but out of pure scumminess.

09-26-2013 , 08:10 PM

#790

Dandys Rule, OK?

banned

Join Date: Apr 2013 Posts: 117

Quote:

Originally Posted by LucidDream

And the more you make these ridiculous arguments that in no way relate to the current situation the more I believe you're ignoring the facts not out of stupidity, but out of pure scumminess.

So if Jungle died, since dealing with such a scenario wasn't inked in a signed contract, jungle would automatically forfeit to dWAN and all the bettors who had his side would have to pay up?

09-26-2013 , 08:13 PM

#791

triplec

newbie

Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 30

step 1: become BFF with notoriously flakey online hero
step 2: side bet notoriously flakey hero's best-in-the-world challenge
step 3: convince notoriously flakey hero to start dodging action if he falls behind
step 4: let 2 years pass
step 5: use this as an excuse to not pay bets
step 6: profit

this is the things you learn on the streets yo

09-26-2013 , 08:21 PM

#792

BreakYaNeck

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Oct 2008 Posts: 8,187

Lol Viffer and Dandys strategy

Make up as much stuff as possible that isnt even remotely close to being relevant hoping everyone else will forget about the actual facts

09-26-2013 , 08:57 PM

#793

BreakYaNeck

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Oct 2008 Posts: 8,187

Jalex can you please ban Dandys rule. No point in having him around. Here is a recent PM he just sent me. He is confirmed mad

"Hey -- I just wanted to say **** you. You're a ****ing pathetic slime bag who wouldn't know logic if it him in his peanut size nutsack. Come LOL me to my face. I'm in Phoenix and I'd be happy to come meet you pussy."

http://gyazo.com/820de583cf9fb484eac0c62c6e34f4b4

09-26-2013 , 09:54 PM

#794

whitelime

old hand

Join Date: Nov 2004 Posts: 1,789

Quote:

Originally Posted by viffer

IM willing to back my opinion up with money, and facts. Can we just bet on whose right?

Or you just going to say im wrong cause you say so?

Are you still looking for more action?

09-26-2013 , 10:10 PM

#795

jungleman

veteran

Join Date: Nov 2008 Posts: 2,038

Quote:

Originally Posted by BreakYaNeck

idk, might be photoshopped like that text i sent viffer

09-26-2013 , 10:41 PM

#796

viffer

old hand

Join Date: Jun 2003 Posts: 1,531

Quote:

Originally Posted by whitelime

Are you still looking for more action?

Yes!!!

I think alot of people are delusional about the reality of life here.

09-26-2013 , 10:52 PM

#797

whitelime

old hand

Join Date: Nov 2004 Posts: 1,789

Quote:

Originally Posted by viffer

Yes!!!

I think alot of people are delusional about the reality of life here.

Have you and Justin hashed out specific terms? I want the same exact terms/escrow as him.

09-26-2013 , 11:05 PM

#798

viffer

old hand

Join Date: Jun 2003 Posts: 1,531

Quote:

Originally Posted by whitelime

Have you and Justin hashed out specific terms? I want the same exact terms/escrow as him.

He is choosing the arbitrators as we speak.

I will let you know the exact terms when we finalize. shouldnt be hard, just a few wording things.

09-26-2013 , 11:09 PM

#799

whitelime

old hand

Join Date: Nov 2004 Posts: 1,789

Quote:

Originally Posted by viffer

He is choosing the arbitrators as we speak.

I will let you know the exact terms when we finalize. shouldnt be hard, just a few wording things.

What is the min/max you will bet?

09-27-2013 , 12:07 AM

#800

viffer

old hand

Join Date: Jun 2003 Posts: 1,531

three fiddy!!!

but you can bet as high as a giraffes ass!!!!!!!

Last edited by viffer; 09-27-2013 at 12:19 AM.

Page 32 of 53

First

12 22 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 42 52

Last

...

Page 32 of 53

First

12 22 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 42 52

Last