Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Discussion of Durrrr challenge thread (former September **** thread) Discussion of Durrrr challenge thread (former September **** thread)

09-15-2013 , 01:20 AM
lol pretty entertaining nice job everyone
09-15-2013 , 01:45 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZeeJustin
Already took out most the big words for you.

Every time you see the word arbitrator, just replace it with mommy and daddy. Maybe that will make more sense to you.
Thanks, where are you now, why dont we lock our self in a room and come up with the conditions? Or lock our self in a room with a deck of cards, a scrabble board, monoply board, and see who leaves with the money?


Lets pick ten professional arbitrators, put there names in a hat and draw one or two, the looser can pay the fees for them.
09-15-2013 , 01:47 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by viffer
Thanks, where are you now, why dont we lock our self in a room and come up with the conditions? Or lock our self in a room with a deck of cards, a scrabble board, monoply board, and see who leaves with the money?


Lets pick ten professional arbitrators, put there names in a hat and draw one or two, the looser can pay the fees for them.
So you don't accept my terms, and have no claim that they are unfair? cool.
09-15-2013 , 01:50 AM
uggh just when I thought something good was gonna come out of all the wasted breath in this thread.
09-15-2013 , 01:51 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZeeJustin
So you don't accept my terms, and have no claim that they are unfair? cool.
I have claimed from the beggining that i want unbiased arbitrators. You play poker with these people all the time, they might have a biased opinion against me from here? Does Taylor post on here? Does Greg?

It just makes more since and seems fairer to have a professional do it, but its clear you dont care whats right or fair just whats in your best interest.

I want the truth to be told, you want your version of the truth to be told.
09-15-2013 , 01:55 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by viffer
maybe greg raymer
Quote:
Originally Posted by viffer
I have claimed from the beggining that i want unbiased arbitrators. You play poker with these people all the time, they might have a biased opinion against me from here? Does Taylor post on here? Does Greg?

It just makes more since and seems fairer to have a professional do it, but its clear you dont care whats right or fair just whats in your best interest.

I want the truth to be told, you want your version of the truth to be told.
LOL complaining about an arbitrator that you suggested just yesterday.
09-15-2013 , 01:56 AM
So the entire poker world is biased in Justin's favor? Ok buddy.

A better and more fair decision can be reached with people who understand poker. It's really comical you only want people who would be confused on a lot of the issues at hand to judge this.
09-15-2013 , 02:00 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NLSoldier
LOL complaining about an arbitrator that you suggested just yesterday.
i said maybe greg,


but then someone told us this and it just makes way more since.


Quote:
Originally Posted by citanul View Post
Talked to a handful of lawyers. They all agreed that if one actually wanted to resolve this with some form of neutral third party, contacting a professional arbitrator is the way to go. They're more than capable of understanding this "complex" situation and taking as an input "we are operating in a universe where we would like gambling contracts to be enforceable."

With my (limited) ability to explain the situation to the lawyers, their opinion was that someone attempting to call these bets void had nothing more to risk than their reputation and ability to make future bets.
why wouldnt we want professionals to decide, i dont understand what all the arguement is about. Dont you want the best dealers, the best hookers? Just saying if your going to do it you might as well do it right? I personally dont want a 50$ hooker when i can have a 50k one, some things are worth getting the best of.
09-15-2013 , 02:02 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cheet
So the entire poker world is biased in Justin's favor? Ok buddy.

A better and more fair decision can be reached with people who understand poker. It's really comical you only want people who would be confused on a lot of the issues at hand to judge this.
What part of this makes it a poker situation?

Two people made a bet, yes it was on a poker event, but other then that nothing is related to poker about our disagreement.
09-15-2013 , 02:04 AM
The reasons for the delay in the event are something that someone who knows poker can better judge
09-15-2013 , 02:15 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cheet
The reasons for the delay in the event are something that someone who knows poker can better judge
Yeah, your right, im sure an arbitrator has never heard of the DOJ!!!!



You have been voted off the island, good bye!!!!
09-15-2013 , 02:38 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PostflopNoob
Primordial - clear your mailbox

The bet isn't on yet
done, should be open now
09-15-2013 , 04:14 AM
Viffer, if I agreed to use 3 professional arbitrators would you be willing to escrow with FWF and let him settle any disagreements on which professional arbitrators to use? I'd escrow too of course.

Basically I think you're wasting my time and I'm done, but if you're willing to send FWF money in escrow then I'll do whatever the **** you want.
09-15-2013 , 04:58 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by viffer
I have claimed from the beggining that i want unbiased arbitrators. You play poker with these people all the time, they might have a biased opinion against me from here? Does Taylor post on here? Does Greg?

It just makes more since and seems fairer to have a professional do it, but its clear you dont care whats right or fair just whats in your best interest.

I want the truth to be told, you want your version of the truth to be told.

You want people that have no prior information of the situation and are as stupid as you are to rule in your favor. You're a ****ing moron.

Last edited by LucidDream; 09-15-2013 at 04:59 AM. Reason: scum too....ldo
09-15-2013 , 05:04 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZeeJustin
Viffer, if I agreed to use 3 professional arbitrators would you be willing to escrow with FWF and let him settle any disagreements on which professional arbitrators to use? I'd escrow too of course.

Basically I think you're wasting my time and I'm done, but if you're willing to send FWF money in escrow then I'll do whatever the **** you want.
I am willing to throw 10-20 professional arbitrators name in the hat hire three and proceed. Someone you know and respect us holding 150k of mine ill pm you the name.

That person can pick the arbitrators.
09-15-2013 , 05:26 AM
Pm sent,
09-15-2013 , 06:42 AM
Yo guys help me out, I can't figure out what this picture is illustrating...

09-15-2013 , 07:10 AM
viffer, when everyone disagrees with you, there's usually a reason for it
09-15-2013 , 07:28 AM
I am looking to bet between 1-2k on WCG. I have been in the poker community for years but have only read the threads on 2+2. I would be willing to escrow the money to a neutral party. I live with IPoke4Fun, and mbradycf (already placed a bet in this thread) can vouch for me. PM if you are interested in taking Sauce. I can provide other references if requested.
09-15-2013 , 07:33 AM
jesus viffer you clearly have too much time
09-15-2013 , 07:47 AM
I'm pretty sure every time I start an argue ment here at the beginning everyone disagrees with me, it's easy for a mob to pick on an I edumacated guy. But in the end things usually change.

I have fought this mob many times and I'm pretty sure they always jump on board in the end. How many people wish they listened to me about Jessey aka one plac? People thought I was crazy when I pointed out stock trader was a cheater.

Come to think of it, I'm pretty sure Taylor Colby who Justin wants as an arbitrator was involved with that.

Alec toreli being on the epic ethics committe

Many more times Ive stood up for what I believe.

Just because I'm not popular doesn't mean I'm wrong.
09-15-2013 , 08:40 AM
It's a pretty special level of arrogance when you have near everyone telling you you're factually wrong and you only think that's because you're "unpopular"

ZeeJustins terms are more than reasonable, accept and ante up and take up your own bet
09-15-2013 , 12:26 PM
A lot of masturbation in this thread about betting with a guy on his ability to call not paying.
09-15-2013 , 01:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cheet
It's a pretty special level of arrogance when you have near everyone telling you you're factually wrong and you only think that's because you're "unpopular"

ZeeJustins terms are more than reasonable, accept and ante up and take up your own bet
My money has been put up. Justin let us know when yours is also, so we dont have to waste any time or energy.

Anyone else id like more action.
09-15-2013 , 05:19 PM
i can't escrow. i'm leaving town tonight for a 7-week trip with spotty/inconsistent internet access and don't want the responsibility/bother

      
m