Quote:
Originally Posted by wdead
People talking about preflop probably never play live poker.
Limping and overlimping can be very profitable.
lol this logic is so ******ed and just thrown around with absolutely no rational behind it.
please tell us why raising in position with any hand worth playing multi-way vs a bunch of limpers in a deep-stack NL game is a worse option then limping?
i love how people just say **** like "oh well online people won't get why this is so great to do live" which really just means "this is the least optimal play to make, but cuz we're all live donks we prefer to try and use our amazing table talk to get people to play bad, rather then force them to make fundamental mistakes".
playing big pots OOP in a deepstack NL game sucks.
using your position to put your opponents in super difficult spots doesn't suck.
edit: as for the hands:
hand 1 is way closer to a call whereas hand 2 seems like a pretty easy fold.
please tell us what possible hand you're trying to represent in hand 1?
you simply never have a hand besides 66 period.
and even tho limon is a bitter old man he's played long enough to know that, and once you FLAT CALL his cold 3 bet you never have 66 unless you're really awful, therefore on any brick river he's obv going to shove.
the more i think about this hand i think its a call on the river if not a shove on the turn.
he could def have a hand like 9Tss/cc which is a very reasonable type hand he'd make that size raise vs that field from the blinds, but i think he's just reading exactly where the two of you are at in the hand such a high % of the time i'd be super tempted to look him up.
obv vs a total donkey its a snap fold on the turn, however vs anyone with limon's experience i would strongly suspect my hand is good.
one big thing to consider is based on both yours and limon's position on the table is it possible he can see your holecards?
hand 2 is a pretty trivial fold.
Last edited by riverboatking; 09-22-2010 at 10:35 AM.