Quote:
Originally Posted by dhcg86
I dont think this is true
100% wrong and not true at all
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hapahauli
I'm a bit rusty on my game theory, but this can't be possible. Mer's overbetting analysis should lead to profits against players who make consistent plays (always call or always fold on river), but it shouldn't guarantee profits against players who play a mixed strategy (X% chance to call, Y% to fold).
Quote:
Originally Posted by nochtm
break even best case.
Don't you mean break even worst case ;P. @hapahauli... let's take a v simple example... river situation, your bet is amazingly polar and is always contained to nuts/total air... you bet pot
your range contains 67% nuts 33% air
give me a mixed strategy that will exploit it?
now give me some mixed strategies that will lose to it
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackpackkk
Always thought you were a sicko, few questions:
how many times have you been broke?
early on I ran up / down a bunch, but before I was playing full time. I kinda tossed myself into having to totally support myself from poker v early, so had to take a super nitty approach to BRM, was living abroad in a foreign country, all bills / school / etc. to pay for. The only time i've been broke after starting to play full time like that was when I got scammed for my whole life roll, other than that never
most absurd poker story?
None really, just tons of typical scams/people who used to be super reputable / your friends gaying you /etc., had a couple of epic spots to go really deep in big events, but could never hold
do you have trouble adjusting to other forms of poker? Mtts and cash and what not?
Cash much more so than MTTs, but not really that much in either, I think HU (if you approach it correctly in how you learn / improve / etc.) really sets an amazing base to transition easily to other
how long would it take for you to make me less terrible?
haha who knows, unfort. I don't have any time atm to find out :-p, been super busy with other projects outside of poker that I can barely find time to play myself, but i'd say I could have anybody who was close to winning before in really good shape, or at least a great base in like... 10-12 hours, a bit longer in some cases (spread out so they have time to think / self-improve, a 10 hour marathon learning session wouldn't fix much ;P)
gl