Spin evROI Noob Question
12-06-2018
, 06:51 AM
Hi guys.
Currently I am grinding 2eus spins on .es network. So far the results are shown below.
My question is:
According to the results I won almost 60 chips per tourney. And as you see, my actual chip won is almost there with the adjusted one. So, I expect that my actual ROI and evROI should be same. No?
When I used the formula for spin evROI
(((60+500)/1500*0.93*3)-1)*100 my evROI is %4.16
With the assumption of I am running in line with my net adjusted chips won I can expect a profit right?
But no! So the question is what am I missing?
Currently I am grinding 2eus spins on .es network. So far the results are shown below.
My question is:
According to the results I won almost 60 chips per tourney. And as you see, my actual chip won is almost there with the adjusted one. So, I expect that my actual ROI and evROI should be same. No?
When I used the formula for spin evROI
(((60+500)/1500*0.93*3)-1)*100 my evROI is %4.16
With the assumption of I am running in line with my net adjusted chips won I can expect a profit right?
But no! So the question is what am I missing?
12-06-2018
, 08:37 AM
12-06-2018
, 04:26 PM
Quote:
It's tilting me that the formula that I once wrote in an unfolded form solely for the explanation purpose is still in use in this awkward form. Come on, it's a simple linear function of cpg (EV of chips per game).
The general function of rake (%) and cpg is:
ROI = ((100 - rake) / 500) * cpg - rake
| Rake,% | ROI,% |
|---|---|
| 9 | 0.182*cpg-9 |
| 8 | 0.184*cpg-8 |
| 7 | 0.186*cpg-7 |
| 6 | 0.188*cpg-6 |
| 5 | 0.19*cpg-5 |
The general function of rake (%) and cpg is:
ROI = ((100 - rake) / 500) * cpg - rake
And I'am wondering your comments on my specific issue. Since, the buy-in is always the same I could not understand the explanations of running cold on distribution of prize pool.
I mean yeah the money won depends on the prize pools but when you run in line with your positive evROI how you can be in the negative side. Even you hit the minimum prize in all of the games still should not it be in positive?