FYI: I posted this in the beginners thread a couple of weeks back and didn't get a response, so I hope you don't mind that I'm reposting it here.

I've played about 1553 games at the $6, $11, and $23 on Full Tilt. In those games I've had about a 5% roi at each level. Right now I'm looking around for holes in my game. Took a look at my pokertracker and noticed my late blind level performance looks like this:

30/60 NL -3413 (5911 hands)
40/80 NL -5418 (3903 hands)
50/100 NL +8421 (1529 hands)
60/120 NL -3262 (640 hands)

Is this a large enough sample size of hands for the late blind levels? I find it odd that I'm down so much at 30/60 and 40/80 but up so big at 50/100 (though the sample size is smaller). Does my late game play need a lot of work or is this typical for these blind sizes to fluctuate a little?

You are probably just a below average postflop player, but a decent to strong late game player. You probably have a better understanding of push-fold poker and apply correct pressure as the psr raises. I'm guessing you lean toward overvaluing your 1pair hands when you have 75bbs, seeing as how you benefit from the raising blinds. I'd suggest watching some hu cash vids, to get a better picture of postflop play.

Wouldn't these results say the exact opposite of what you just said? At the 15/30, 40/80, and 50/100 levels is where I'm winning all of my chips. It's in the late blind stages where I seem to be losing the most.

Just wondering for people that have had success at any limits if it's common to have such a disparity between your late blinds results and your early blinds results, ie is this indicative of a late game weakness I have, or is more indicative of my post flop play in the early going>?

See the problem? according to your numbers you're not winning chips other than at 50/100 which is high blinds.

Yes I noticed...I'm just trying to gain some perspective on the sample size because of the high variance at those levels. But I guess what you're saying is by then, especially at the 30/60 and 40/80 I should be a winner?

That's in tournament chips, yeah? If so def not significantly different.

Yes, that's in tournament chips. Sorry, what do you mean "def not significantly different"? From what?

You're like 5 buyins up or down at the blind level, too much variance for that to be a significant difference

Math teachers itt

I stand by what I originally said...if you are losing at the two first levels, winning at the third but losing in the forth (over a much smaller sample size), you just can't play postflop and probably lose at the highest cause you lost too many flips...

All I know for sure is that your postflop game needs work, and your 3bet game might be bad.
I can't really comment if you are a good push-fold player for sure...I just think it's more likely that you play shallow better than most of your villains.

30/60 and 40/80 are the third and fourth levels in a Full Tilt turbo, 15/30 and 20/40 are the first two levels. I win a lot of chips at the first two levels.