Looked up a guy at the 15s and asked him if we wanted to chop. he said all in so i thought by his graph that meant ok. I'm not on here looking to out him or anything, but just wanna know if i was wrong here or if anyone else has dealt with this "yazpid" player.

PokerStars Hand #107677601886: Tournament #824409760, $14.39+$0.61 USD Hold'em No Limit - Match Round I, Level I (10/20) - 2013/11/27 15:29:57 ET
Table '824409760 1' 2-max Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: jrocnoxious7 (1500 in chips)
Seat 2: yazpid (1500 in chips)
jrocnoxious7: posts small blind 10
yazpid: posts big blind 20
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to jrocnoxious7 [7d 9d]
jrocnoxious7 said, "chop?"
yazpid said, "all in"
jrocnoxious7: raises 1480 to 1500 and is all-in
yazpid: calls 1480 and is all-in
*** FLOP *** [3s Ah 3c]
*** TURN *** [3s Ah 3c] [3h]
*** RIVER *** [3s Ah 3c 3h] [4s]
*** SHOW DOWN ***
yazpid: shows [Qh Qc] (a full house, Threes full of Queens)
jrocnoxious7: shows [7d 9d] (three of a kind, Threes)
yazpid collected 3000 from pot
jrocnoxious7 finished the tournament in 2nd place
yazpid wins the tournament and receives $28.78 - congratulations!
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 3000 | Rake 0
Board [3s Ah 3c 3h 4s]
Seat 1: jrocnoxious7 (button) (small blind) showed [7d 9d] and lost with three of a kind, Threes
Seat 2: yazpid (big blind) showed [Qh Qc] and won (3000) with a full house, Threes full of Queens

you realize he never agreed to chop? i can see a bit of a angle but thats it.

Cheap lesson if you ask me: dont chop vs unknowns

Don't chop with people at the $15s, there's so much to learn if you're sitting a winning player every 30 games it's actually very helpful. Any player at the $15s, myself, yourself, anyone that ever played the $15s, is very exploitable, so it's a great lesson to recognize weaknesses in players that beat the field and learning how to take advantage of them.

ok guys thanks for the input you can close this thread or whatev