This player was constantly donkbeteando me and made a very complicated overbet on the river, so I think it was the best decision to go all in because even if I had the Q or the J to doubt, in addition to his bet seemed more bluff than a bet for value. What do you think, friends?

This hand would be fold here, cuz you actually block major part of his bluffing range Kx. Also blocking K9 and AK is irrelevant, cuz BB either 3bets these hands pre-flop or x/r flop as this board is v/ volatile.

ty ty

You are representing **** by the river

I'm not sure the hand has to be a fold, both players are representing ****, so if OP has a decent enough read that villain is likely enough to be bluffing than a call would be good.

When villain folds it just shows you where bluffing with the best hand 90% of the time, so what's the point?

Without info is a fold, but your reads seems correct, so could have been a good call.

When raising important questions you have to ask yourself is do you think you are ahead? Will they call with anything worse? (if not just call).


I agree that maybe can fold out some of his Q's, or J's, (well more likely J's and T's), this would be a good reason, but if your read is more than villains bet seems "more bluff than value" then just call as you have value anyway...

----

Still most likely a fold normally.

Moves like that only serve to bust your variance, flop is more likely a check back readless since its heavily wet and hits std readless range quite well, and river is an easy fold.