Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
****PALINCA vs BORDERLINE Official Thread (Borderline Wins)**** ****PALINCA vs BORDERLINE Official Thread (Borderline Wins)****

09-30-2010 , 12:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjw006
nah i think everyone just wants the borderline side eddy
i want palinca, we have to support ourselfs beetween french donks !
09-30-2010 , 12:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by palinca
I would bet 20$s with you but you have to take borderlines side
Or you could bet the $20 on me, so you only lose $380 when you do lose.
09-30-2010 , 12:16 PM
yeah im def willing to bet $200 on border if i can get 1.5:1 which doesnt seem like is gonna happen since donks started offering 1:1
09-30-2010 , 12:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by borderline
I have no problem with it being public. I was even going to post it myself, but I figured I had enough lazy haters to ship me $1-20 to out my SN's.

As far as what I'm smoking, it's good stuff, you want me to hook you up?
lol sure dude, although i thought the only thing you smoke is a pole
09-30-2010 , 12:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjw006
yeah im def willing to bet $200 on border if i can get 1.5:1 which doesnt seem like is gonna happen since donks started offering 1:1
not sure why you want 1.5:1 when you keep talking about how good he is in theory(I agree, I think his "pure strat posts" are good). 1:1 is fair imo. I'll bet 100 at 1:1 if you want.
09-30-2010 , 12:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjw006
more interesting palinca... what were your results on FTP? Your 300 games sample on stars is nothing really...

and yeah eddie the line will indeed work itself out
lol 50 games isnt much either
09-30-2010 , 12:32 PM
theory =! playing.
09-30-2010 , 12:33 PM
I don't think I've ever said borderline is good... Even in theory! (I challenge u to find me saying this anywhere)...

I have said his posts have improved...
09-30-2010 , 12:33 PM
with the way you brag about "anyone can beat 500$ if this guy can beat them" etc etc, you really shouldn't get more than 1:1 lol.

Edit: yeah sorry mjw, mixed you up with some others, couldn't find it. Still. 100$ at 1:1 available if no one takes 1.5:1.
09-30-2010 , 12:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TJJT
lol 50 games isnt much either

Odds of me winning after 51 games
61.3% if I have a 52% winrate
76.4% if I have a 55% winrate
92.6% if I have a 60% winrate

Odds of me winning after 101 games
65.7% if I have a 52% winrate
84.4% if I have a 55% winrate
97.9% if I have a 60% winrate


As for as multi-tabling. I'm not used to multi-tabling, so why would I agree to it? Especially over a small sample? If palinca wants to 2-table we can possibly do more games?

Updates soon to come?!
09-30-2010 , 12:37 PM
1-tabling is obv fine. gogogo
09-30-2010 , 12:39 PM
Gonna be good... would love to rail to witness some borderline meltdowns LIVE
09-30-2010 , 12:39 PM
Sorry xer but I'm never taking 1:1... Have u read this guys strat posts???

Ok, true story can be confirmed. Border said on msn that you should pass up on +ev spots to wait for better spots in husngs... JJ vs AK was one of his fine examples and he argued it to the death..!

1.5:1 anyone?
09-30-2010 , 12:40 PM
lol but everyone does that in the start haha, how long is it since he said that?
and also, spamz keeps vouching for him, so that obv scares me away from 1.5:1

Last edited by Xereles; 09-30-2010 at 12:42 PM. Reason: lol 1:5-1
09-30-2010 , 12:41 PM
Yesterday...
09-30-2010 , 12:42 PM
uh.. 2 days.
09-30-2010 , 12:42 PM
i smell some hustling.





: )
09-30-2010 , 12:42 PM
what kind of odds can i get to bet on palinca
09-30-2010 , 12:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by yaqh
what kind of odds can i get to bet on palinca
I'm kind of curious on this myself.
09-30-2010 , 12:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by borderline
Haha. What I did was maybe out of line, but it definitely does not cross any ethics and morals line.
wat, does not compute
09-30-2010 , 12:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jayn
i smell some hustling.





: )
i can post the log of the chat if you want if you give mjw006 1:5 to 1.
09-30-2010 , 12:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Newff
wat, does not compute
what ethics and morals was i breaking or stepping out of boundaries when I posted that?

It was out of line, and I got infracted rightly for it.
09-30-2010 , 12:46 PM
Hahaha border is making it sound like I'm legit hustling... I'm going to sleep this is Bs.
09-30-2010 , 12:50 PM
(not jayluf)
09-30-2010 , 12:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by borderline
Odds of me winning after 51 games
61.3% if I have a 52% winrate
76.4% if I have a 55% winrate
92.6% if I have a 60% winrate

Odds of me winning after 101 games
65.7% if I have a 52% winrate
84.4% if I have a 55% winrate
97.9% if I have a 60% winrate


As for as multi-tabling. I'm not used to multi-tabling, so why would I agree to it? Especially over a small sample? If palinca wants to 2-table we can possibly do more games?

Updates soon to come?!
I would absolutely like 2 tables, we can do best of 100 with 20 games min per session (or 15 games min).

      
m