Quote:
Originally Posted by ChicagoRy
People can discuss it in this thread if they want.
Ok , i dont see the point of making a software tableselecting when there is no `slots`
-when you play zoom cash you dont have waiting list for play vs rec player..
-When you register in a MTT you cant table select,
I would like to read from you, or other spinwiz creators/backers, why do you think it is better for all users overall to tableselect rather than all sit random ( the natural way, best reg win the most)
Now waiting list are getting very big at 30 and 60, a lot of weak reg should be playing lower are bumhunting..
I think one of the most important , is , as emotionx said, most of the reg are not ready to sacrifice some EV at shorttime by seating weak regs ... they prefer seat the weakest oponent(fish).
If all reg act this way, weaker regs/bumhunters will never go down(or study and get better) when they have to .
I only see spinwizz benefit people in, or running, a stable of horses, and weaks regs.
Anyway, I think very easy option you have to implement in spinwizz soft is by
limiting the maximum number of people you dont want to seat by half (or 33%) of the active player using spinwizz at each stacks
Ex; there is 100 users of spinwiz, you can only mark 33 of them in you NONseat list, no more.
As there is almost no way to see who are the bests before playing them, i think i have got a good idea.
And off course make sure if i have someone marked seat, and him doesnt have me marked , will we seat anyway at the same tables (not sure if it is the case now)
I might be wrong, but anyway thank to you spinwizz team , for your work and for listen us!
Last edited by 7a.m.@hu; 03-11-2015 at 06:40 PM.