I vaguely recall two guys ($100 Spin regs) are in BKK and both are also members of $100s or $200s Hyper division as well. I'm not super friendly with them tho so can't exactly hook you up, but at least you know they're in town.

I don't think anyone is saying it's impossible, but if you look at spinlyser...see who is playing 4000+ games a month with 55+ chip ev at stakes $30+. The answer is very, very few.

Got a question about how Spinlyser is marking their games since it doesn't make a ton of sense to me.

If you go on the homepage (https://spinlyzer.com/Dashboard), you get to see a list of stakes (15s, 30s, 60s, and 100s) along with the percentage of 0 reg games and 1 reg games.

Now here's my question. As I am marked as a 'reg' in spinlyser, are games where I am drawn against two non-regs marked as a '1 reg game' or not? And none of my games will ever be marked as '0 reg games' while I still have a 'regular' tag?

Let's take the 30s for an example. At the time of writing, '0 reg games' are at 20.5%, 1 reg games are at 42.1%. Does this mean 20.5% of games take place with 3 players who don't have a 'regular' tag? And 42.1% of games are taking place with 1 guy who has a 'regular' tag and 2 guys who do not (since from the perspective of that one regular, the game is a '0 reg game', even though he is a regular himself). And if that's the case, why are there no stats to show the number of 2 reg games and 3 reg games?

Or are the stats on the homepage shown from the perspective of a single regular player (i.e. a 1 reg game is actually a 2 reg game and a 0 reg game is actually a 1 reg game?). And the remaining percentage is distributed into 2 reg games (i.e. all 3 players are regulars), and true zero reg games (where all 3 players are not regulars).

Hoping that makes sense.

on dashboard "No reg games" mean: 0 regs games ; 1 regs games mean: 1 reg game ; so remaining ratio indicate 2 regs+ games . it not show data from your perspective as there are global data . it's made in this way I believe because we can make deduction of difficulties of level by to redirect our attention on softness of field, as 0 and 1 reg games we perceive soft, so if something is not soft then is strong(=difficult). I like this system, very intuitive.

Yeah I take it to mean that 0 reg games have no regulars in them. In 1 reg games that I'm playing in I'm the only reg.

It would be interesting to know % of 2+ reg games by hour of day. Honestly when I play in the morning (aus time zone) there are way less Hungarian crushers than when I play at night so I usually do better and enjoy the games more. It would be cool to see data breaking it down. I'm also playing at the 15s

So they reduced the probability of the top prize by 66.6%, and didnt increase any other probability (only x2!), lol! Thats the goal of Amaya, less people win, more rake-traps, 1 in 1 million lol, its a waste of time, better play the lottery, but ... if people still plays them ... guess what Amaya is going to do

actually the fact that they reduced probability of highest multiplier is the best think which could happen for an grinder in general, as you do not base your profit from spins on 12000x (not lifetimes enough to realize equity of this one). other think is that yes, they higher rake on 15-30$ buy-in by increased 2x and lowered 4x which is bad, but effective rake (not counting 3 top prize pools) is increased only by 0.2% from 7 to 7.2 ( due the fact that they reduced top one by 3 ). however on the other hand, they reduced variance in 60$+ and now effective rake is lowered by 0.8% in those games, so from 7 to 6.2%.

imo is good think what they done for ecosystem as now smaller number of 60$ regs will come play at 30$. so for 30's players is mean that they have softer competition when rake increased only by 0.2%. rather good deal.

Just another Jackpot SnG type thing but it's all Slots/Casino players so soft as all hell. 200% Deposit bonus is pretty decent though and you get it all up front rather than released in chunks like 888/FTP etc. Gotta play it through though obv.

Yeah good deal, rake increase without any benefit. What when recs realize that it never hits. Worse than lottery 1 in 3 million to win big prize. If you play 1.000.000 rake & go's there is a 36.79% chance you never hit one (and if you hit you have to win it). Lol 7% rake hypers

50% 0-reg games, must be nice

Ew, that looks like a lot of **** to eat.

for me yes, for you I don't know, seems like you are not happy... maybe then you should stop playing them..?

p.s. fish will stop when they get bored of them not when they will realize something, as per definition fishes not thinking about profitability of their actions.

#Gremio, 43.4cEV is not very good imo. it is not a surprise that huge money variations occured. with 60+cEV you are relativity safe and 70+ variance do not concerning you much.

The increase of the % of 0-reg games is correlated with the ABI drop... which indicates that the probability of a 0-reg game is so much bigger in $15s than in $30s.

LOL and LOL

With 60+ "you are relativity safe" = probably not losing money.
So safe!

Also 3 people has 70+ cEV @ the 15s and non at 30+, so that's that.

Also lol at with 70 chips variance 'won't concern you much'.

I mean money swings, variance is always same.

Only 3 people at the 15s have 70+ cEV? Is this true or just a random number you pulled out of your head? And if so since what date?

GRRRiZ and Alicia2112 are the only ones I know with 70+ chips that play reasonable volume.

Of course a lot of people that are capable of 70+ chips will play higher anyway.

Anyone who plays 60s and higher would like to be interviewed for husng.com? PM!

Obv, I just make up numbers and claim it as the truth. Why not?
Let me give you a random date, too : 12 May 2015.
(L1VE FOREVER is the third with the above mentioned)

Well you have only 9 posts on 2+2 so your word isn't automatically credible as fish love to exaggerate in their frustration of getting crushed.

I want to be included in the 70chipev++ in 15s, please.

10 RaydeN08 $15 2,290 $1,997 7.9% 72.0 $2,696 $3,594 $19 $917

Thank you, I feel more confident in myself now.

According to Spinlyzer you're a high stakes reg who for some reason decided to play nearly 5000 games at the 15s in March?

When I said I only know of two people, I was really referring to those who regularly play the stake, not someone from higher up who decided to play low stakes for only a month.

Of course as noted already a lot of people with the ability to get 70+ chips move up long before they become 'regulars' at a stake.