Quote:
Originally Posted by acbarone
Key is to get a stake from some Spin group and slave away in poverty til they drop you.
I have serious doubts about whether playing the $2*x limit in a stable, especially at a site with the 10000x+ multiplier, is more +EV than playing the $x limit and paying for coaching on one's own.
The reason for my doubts is that, though I don't know what the actual cuts are in the market, I realise that stables have to insure themselves hard against stakerolling. Unless the horse has ferroconcrete references, the stable should structure the agreement so that the horse's liability in case of winning a top jackpot is very limited, and thus the cut from lower multiplier prizes is more in the stable's favour than the horse would like, because the stable can't really hope to get a $150K cut handed on a silver plate if the horse ships $300K.
Maybe it's possible to tailor a good staking agreement at Stars.com where the 12000x now falls only once in 1M games, just giving 95% of that jackpot to the horse as the contribution towards the payout tier is merely 0.4% of the buy-in. But at partypoker, where the top jackpot lands 8 times out of 1M (albeit with 4 players per tourney), it eats 2% of the buy-in and I doubt that a mutually satisfactory agreement is possible for the $20s. The same holds for Winamax / Stars.fr €25+, where staking is also hindered by logistic trouble (the inability to withdraw anywhere but to a bank account).