Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
** Official Spin and Go's Discussion Thread ** ** Official Spin and Go's Discussion Thread **

10-07-2014 , 05:12 PM
$15 6m hypers haven't been so disgusting since I started playing them. They don't run enough during day time on week days for me to play so I have to grind at night on week days and even then the tables are filled with regs. Pretty lol that Stars refused to launch 18m hypers for liquitidy reasons but they went ahead and launched this crap.
** Official Spin and Go's Discussion Thread ** Quote
10-07-2014 , 05:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Armed_Robbery
i was referring to you saying spin and gos are a -EV format, which is not true. obviously i cannot give numbers yet, but in the actual state winrates of good players should definitely exceed 36%.
but how much is the average rake in the long run? Whats the average prizepool?
Isnt it smaller than 3x the buy in -rake in the long run? I expect it to be. Thats why im saying its -ev. A good player can ofc have an edge in a 3 handed sngs, but if the bingo prizepools equal extra rake, its simply not beatable anymore.
So it would be nice if anyone could tell if thats the case.
** Official Spin and Go's Discussion Thread ** Quote
10-07-2014 , 05:50 PM
Yeah there are/will be people good enough to beat the games in its current format.
** Official Spin and Go's Discussion Thread ** Quote
10-07-2014 , 06:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chinagambler
$15 6m hypers haven't been so disgusting since I started playing them. They don't run enough during day time on week days for me to play so I have to grind at night on week days and even then the tables are filled with regs. Pretty lol that Stars refused to launch 18m hypers for liquitidy reasons but they went ahead and launched this crap.
It makes perfect sense from a profit only perspective for stars. They are saying that there have been 100+ top prize pool 1$ spin&go tournaments so far meaning that roughly 2million of those have run already lol. The rake in those things is higher than in any other hyper turbo they offer so yea, sadly it makes sense from a rake as much as you can perspective
** Official Spin and Go's Discussion Thread ** Quote
10-07-2014 , 06:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by blakkman08
It makes perfect sense from a profit only perspective for stars. They are saying that there have been 100+ top prize pool 1$ spin&go tournaments so far meaning that roughly 2million of those have run already lol. The rake in those things is higher than in any other hyper turbo they offer so yea, sadly it makes sense from a rake as much as you can perspective
or they rigged it to give that money in the beginning as a publicity stunt
** Official Spin and Go's Discussion Thread ** Quote
10-07-2014 , 07:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by blakkman08
It makes perfect sense from a profit only perspective for stars. They are saying that there have been 100+ top prize pool 1$ spin&go tournaments so far meaning that roughly 2million of those have run already lol. The rake in those things is higher than in any other hyper turbo they offer so yea, sadly it makes sense from a rake as much as you can perspective
They make 140k in rake per week from a $1 SNG lol not bad.
** Official Spin and Go's Discussion Thread ** Quote
10-07-2014 , 09:16 PM
Regarding the sounds played at the start of a Spin & Go: they aren't played if the beta sounds are enabled as I've told above, but if default / custom sounds are installed, then the sequence played at the start is snd14.wav (3 times) + snd15.wav + snd16.wav from <PS folder>\snd\. If you delete these files, the sounds won't be played, as long as you use a custom shortcut that launches PokerStars.exe.

Recall that the default shortcut created during installation launches PokerStarsUpdate.exe, which checks whether any files in the client folder are altered, and if they are (like in our case; note that, if you replace snd15.wav by your own file with the same name, PSU.exe will detect the change), it prompts to download 'a newer version', but in fact it's usually not new, it just redownloads the default files, including the spinning sounds. Of course you need to still run the updater manually from time to time, to avoid missing useful but not mandatory (not forced by PS.exe) updates, and then remove the sounds manually.

Note that, if you delete the sounds after you've launched the client, then the default spinning sounds will still be played during that session, so remove the files (snd14-16) prior to launching Pokerstars.exe.

Alternatively, just use the beta sounds; I find them (as well as the default pack) too tilting and have started using calmer custom ones again.

Last edited by coon74; 10-07-2014 at 09:42 PM.
** Official Spin and Go's Discussion Thread ** Quote
10-07-2014 , 09:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by coon74
Regarding the sounds played at the start of a Spin & Go: they aren't played if the beta sounds are enabled as I've told above, but if default / custom sounds are installed, then the sequence played at the start is snd14.wav (3 times) + snd15.wav + snd16.wav from <PS folder>\snd\. If you delete these files, the sounds won't be played, as long as you use a custom shortcut that launches PokerStars.exe.

Recall that the default shortcut created during installation launches PokerStarsUpdate.exe, which checks whether any files in the client folder are altered, and if they are (like in our case; note that, if you replace snd15.wav by your own file with the same name, PSU.exe will detect the change), it prompts to download 'a newer version', but in fact it's usually not new, it just redownloads the default files, including the spinning sounds. Of course you need to still run the updater manually from time to time, to avoid missing useful but not mandatory (not forced by PS.exe) updates, and then remove the sounds manually.

Note that, if you delete the sounds after you've launched the client, then the default spinning sounds will still be played during that session, so remove the files (snd14-16) prior to launching Pokerstars.exe.

Alternatively, just use the beta sounds; I find them (as well as the default pack) too tilting and have started using calmer custom ones again.

Are there really people here who grind these? Im curious.
** Official Spin and Go's Discussion Thread ** Quote
10-07-2014 , 09:57 PM
Some people even play 9-12 tables of $30s.
** Official Spin and Go's Discussion Thread ** Quote
10-07-2014 , 10:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ro0tseven
but how much is the average rake in the long run? Whats the average prizepool?
Isnt it smaller than 3x the buy in -rake in the long run? I expect it to be. Thats why im saying its -ev. A good player can ofc have an edge in a 3 handed sngs, but if the bingo prizepools equal extra rake, its simply not beatable anymore.
So it would be nice if anyone could tell if thats the case.
Average rake in the long run is 7% for $1 games, 5% for $3s, and 4% for $7 and up. The average prize pools are 2.79, 2.85, and 2.88 buyins respectively. No additional rake is charged.
** Official Spin and Go's Discussion Thread ** Quote
10-08-2014 , 12:38 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by watergun7
I'm sorry just because it's winner take all doesn't make collusion a non-factor. If you know that BB is softplaying- or even if not and you are only sharing a BR with the guy in the BB, then you can open atc on the button profitably. It's pretty big deal if you ask me.
This is wrong because if you take money from your buddy in BB you are actually not winning anything. You only win 0.5bb when sb folds.
** Official Spin and Go's Discussion Thread ** Quote
10-08-2014 , 08:07 AM
Yeah because in the sb's perspective if he is playing gto his ev is the same when facing a button open and when facing a button fold.
** Official Spin and Go's Discussion Thread ** Quote
10-08-2014 , 09:24 AM
pokerstars, do you introduce higher stakes spin and gos?
omaha H/L spin and gos?
why no antes in a no limit format?
where to get the background colours of spin and gos for normal tables?
** Official Spin and Go's Discussion Thread ** Quote
10-08-2014 , 09:36 AM
Please don't introduce higher spin and goes.
** Official Spin and Go's Discussion Thread ** Quote
10-08-2014 , 10:02 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by watergun7
Please don't introduce higher spin and goes.
why? they'd be very much appreciated by those who will need to grind up the status during Xmas by the end of the year!
** Official Spin and Go's Discussion Thread ** Quote
10-08-2014 , 10:56 AM
Well before spin and goes there was 6max hypers. And as mentioned ITT before the risk/incentive of collusion etc is far too big for something like this to be introduced higher (think about it- fewer games running, more regs, bigger chance of being in same sng as your "partner(s)").

I believe stars used to run 10k husngs but they were removed for similar reasons (hardly ever running, being a liability to stars and regs alike rather than a grindable stake).
** Official Spin and Go's Discussion Thread ** Quote
10-08-2014 , 11:20 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AVO
why? they'd be very much appreciated by those who will need to grind up the status during Xmas by the end of the year!
It would be the nice side of the change, but the nasty side would be that some of the fish from the 30s would migrate to the 60s too and lose money there faster...
** Official Spin and Go's Discussion Thread ** Quote
10-08-2014 , 02:00 PM
1632 games in for the $15s, 36.3% win %, 36.4% EV win %, down $270 pre-RB (roughly even post-RB). So definitely not feeling the positive side of variance, haven't participated in one of the top 3 tiers yet. Win rate looks pretty strong, tho, so gonna keep grinding and see what happens.

Games do appear a bit tougher than the first few days, been noticing more and more purple tags (good regs) and Supernovas as my tables recently. Although a few of the Novas suck.
** Official Spin and Go's Discussion Thread ** Quote
10-09-2014 , 02:15 AM
thinking that unless you run hot and hit some Top 3 pricepool you have 8% rake is scary, but if you remember that your rakeback will be only on the first 4% it become just disgusting
** Official Spin and Go's Discussion Thread ** Quote
10-09-2014 , 02:22 AM
Q is thinking that the ROI is going to be the same as in usual hypers. It must be a bit higher in Spins because additional fish flocks there from cash games (the ring game traffic has fallen by 9% according to Pokerscout), while regs coming from there are not so good at SnG play either.
Spoiler:
Or you can say that it's become lower in usual hypers because fish is leaving them. View it as you wish, the glass is both semi-full and semi-empty.
** Official Spin and Go's Discussion Thread ** Quote
10-09-2014 , 07:06 AM
Wouldn't it be nice if pokerstars replaced all 9- and 10-handed formats (cash, stt and mtt) by 3-handed formats. Without the spin please.
** Official Spin and Go's Discussion Thread ** Quote
10-09-2014 , 07:35 AM
it's just me or spins are killing action on stars?
** Official Spin and Go's Discussion Thread ** Quote
10-09-2014 , 07:40 AM
also disconnects dramatically increased in all formats
** Official Spin and Go's Discussion Thread ** Quote
10-09-2014 , 07:53 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ohmyquad
it's just me or spins are killing action on stars?
Its just you I think. Everyone else is getting tonnes of action in 'regular' SNGs - HU, 6max, 9max etc all bursting at the seams with fish - sooooooooooo much action atm. Regs have never been so content and optimistic about the future.

Last edited by Kerrydo; 10-09-2014 at 08:09 AM.
** Official Spin and Go's Discussion Thread ** Quote

      
m