Also tell him he'd get more games/hour 6 tabling and acting 3x faster (which still would be reasonably slow)

he seems to be doing just fine from his stats, from what ive played with him (3 games or so HU) he takes a while to act but plays pretty solid for being in 10+ tables, he also spoke in chat to me lol not a bot

played with him some aswell, whats interesting is(you can really see the decisionmaking) is looking by his monthly volume and how it corresponds to his chipEV.

Aug 500ish games @ 75cEV = alright i got my ranges down now and feel great about this
September already over 4,5k games @ 46cEV = FULL THROTTLE LETS DO THIS

The August sample size is too small, plus the cEV naturally falls when the number of tables is increased, but the thing is that the hourly still grows this way.

There's little incentive to move up to the $30s at all because the skill gap between the fields is too big, isn't it?

In a year or two, the stake that will be offering the best income-to-study-effort ratio will be the 7s almost regardless of the BR size, then the 3s after a while. I doubt that the 1s will ever become too reg-infested, though, because it will be more profitable for most people to have a real job than to be a reg of the 1s.

I think poker will hardly ever die completely - there will be a bit of microstakes fish and such asocial addicts as me will still be able to grind with a bit of profit.

Damn... 1s becoming reg infested?

in b4 1$ cartel

Even if it happens, there will hardly ever be a cartel in the upcoming $0.25s because the $0.25 regs won't be able to afford to pay a programmer for the maintenance of the seating software, or they'll find a Vietnamese one who'll do the job for a plate of rice but will end up writing a buggy piece of soft that will work worse than manual registration.

Yes aug sample is small but considering hes holding such good cEV 15-tabling i have no doubt his true cEV is around 70 if he 2-4 tabled or whatever # he can play really well

He's maximising the holy hourly:

30 games/hour x $1.6/game = $48/hour;
60 games/hour x $0.9/game = $54/hour.

Mkay, 50 chips/game 3-4 tabling 30s (if he starts playing them immediately, without extra coaching) -> $2/game (incl. VIP).

30 games/hour x $2/game = $60/hour but the variance is bigger.

spin tilt is legit lol

Holy ****. The moment he realised he wasn't beating the games or something?

that was just that day. He got a positive spinROI but that is the swings youre looking at when you have 30-35 chipEV. (30.3 in his case)

Over compulsive believers, sinners

i have no idea lol we have all felt that way, ive had a lesser beating off of someone that haf beef with me than that dude gave him self tho hope hes ok lol

Did he actually knock his self out? or he just kept low on the ground out of shame, realizing it was streamed. good stuff

lol i have no idea hope hes ok tho :d

highly unlikely.

probably this.

lol thats fantastic

That last spinwizz update make me have my games/hours divide by two... change it please!

Guys this is my graph for the 7dollar games so far....need a few 100 dollars to move up to the 15 dollar because i cashed a lot out.....Has anyone got some recent experience from moving up from 7 to 15 dollar...Wat ROI Decline can i expect!
I also search for some players to talk strategy of Spin Go's that have a decent ROI at the 15's or 30's

Regards

Ruud

your results are very good. I think you can expect something like 70chipEV/game on 15's which is about 8%ROI.

So this is how you handle spin&go variance

Got HU today and player I was up against disconnected/sat out. He was not a reg.

Curious to what the community feels proper etiquette is in that spot. I know that vs a reg we're supposed to wait (although it seems I've got mixed results from HU players when I've DC'd), but is anyone waiting vs a recreational or sending them $ back?

raise quickly and win the game before they get back

Don't send to any non-regs, they won't send to you. I wouldn't send to any reg that I don't know unless they've sent to me in the past.

Is anyone here sending someones equity share of a 100x+ without knowing them really well?