Quote:
Fields would be a lot tougher, fewer fish would be drawn to these SNGs since the top prize is smaller.
Too many people ITT want to have their cake and eat it, too. They want games that are as soft as the Spin and Gos without having to endure the jackpot variance. Tough ****. The games are only so soft because there is an element of jackpot variance involved in order to lure the fish there in the first place.
So go and play 100 K + games with a strong win rate and stop complaining about how you might have a losing month.
yeah, cause 100x buyins isnn't high enough! And lol at 100k games, make it 1mil and then we're talking as it stands.
Seriously guys...
$30 Spin & Go Probability
$3,000 - 25 of 100,000
$1,500 - 50 of 100,000
$750 - 100 of 100,000
$300 - 1,000 of 100,000
$180 - 8,000 of 100,000
$120 - 21,925 of 100,000
$60 - 68,900 of 100,000
3% of the prize pool goes to rake
Nvm the 50/30/20 payout structure, it would actually be worse!
Here are some simulations of as it stands and how it could be:
...i think it would make a huge difference!
Please stars, at least if you're considering making stakes higher than 30s, consider this. (hence also why the 3% rake)