Anyone who makes 60 chips at $7s is at least as strong as most of those who earn 100 chips at $0.25s, just because regs tend to use 50+ BI BRM in order not to have to move down all the time, so moving up 3 limits is usually correlated with ample experience and hence skill improvement.
Besides, the population tendencies of $0.25s and $7s are different, and someone with a strong fish game but a weak reg game would do fine at $0.25s but would have to watch zzzTilt videos or something to adapt to $7s regs. (Skier's DB is probably an overkill for $7s.)
I'm seeing the voyage to $0.25s as an opportunity to hone the fish game
Quote:
Originally Posted by gdaviezz
you can probably get 90+ cev at $7s and the players there are not much different to 25c players
Wut?
Variance reduction pools don't serve $0.25 players but obviously serve $3+ regs. From my very limited knowledge of staking offers, some stables accept applicants who're proven winners at $3+ but don't accept $0.25 regs unless the latter agree for a contract at least a year long, so $7 games must be more abundant in staked regs than $0.25s that are abundant in Eastern Europeans but mostly very disinhibited recreational ones.
OK, I think I've just been levelled, gg.
And to clarify, as a Leatherass disciple (but a ton lazier than him), I always focus on the edges that I can have right now in my current development state, not longterm prospects, as I'm still rather seeing myself as a Spin Max reg in the long run, just I want to avoid $7 and possibly $15 Spin Max because their payouts are way too often winner-take-all and so leaving little edge for me, and am tempted to substitute them for €5-10 HexaPro when the time is right, so I still need some HU skill.
Last edited by coon74; 12-04-2018 at 08:54 AM.