Quote:
Originally Posted by ShaneO19
I think this pretty much covers every point on the issue. No one against more lobbies gives any true explanation of their reasoning. It is frustrating too because I know a vast majority of players hate the current lobby system and would like it changed. I guess most of them either don't post on 2+2 or are afraid to speak up about it on here though.
This
combined with things like this;
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drooler
More lobbies = Longer wait times. This is neither good for PokerStars or regs so NO THANKS!
(unknowns or people with low posts who aren't even known on the forum and don't want to admit their screen name (so might be 1.5$ regs who are clueless) )
and poor reasoning probably skews it and makes it look like some want it some don't want it.
But i think if you look at the arguments, I'm sure it leans towards more lobbies.
**Disclaimer** Im not preaching for unlimited per se or turbos/reg speeds.
But if you have a viewpoint and want to be heard, then at least provide solid arguments.
Aside from Skaiwalkurrr and perhaps Siervos and Harthor no-one else should be against at least 2 more lobbies. After all they are the ones doing all our dirty work now. If you are so scared that there are too many regs, then hunt some yourself, in stead of arguing for a less then optimal solution for everyone, because then you need less people putting in their time to "police the lobbys" for you.
More lobbies = More choice.
Recreational players can choose better which "presumed regular" they want to play, or even attempt to opensit, which is impossible for them now.
You don't get annoyed with registering simultaneously with regs because you chose to sit him (in reality u were 0.1second later in regging then him)
And people who don't want to sit certain regs can avoid em.
Imagine i want to not play chadders0 at 200s because we are friendly and we think theres little point in it.
Right now i have some games vs chadders because of same time regs.
Imagine there are more / unlimited lobbies, i can CHOOSE to avoid chadders as he does to avoid me. While if for example fartojop opensits a lobby under me i can CHOOSE again to sit him.
Everyone who knows me, knows I'm definitely not a bum hunter, but i do like free choice and the ability to make ur own decisions. That includes deciding if i am gonna play a session where i sit regs today, or take it easy and get in some games against recreational players.
Allow me to make this decision for myself pokerstars.
after all, by allowing me to do so, IF i opt for a day of just grind vs recreationals, then if some reg who dislikes me CHOOSES to hunt me, he can still sit me and play me
(UNLIKE HU CASH!!!)
And if you say more lobbies might favor bum hunters too much (compared to 2) , then really explain to me how all bum hunters have the nut nut solid stats right now?
While players who might be better like harthor have sick swings?
Last edited by fastcolt; 02-17-2012 at 10:44 PM.