***HU SNG REGS THREAD***
06-10-2009
, 12:22 AM
06-10-2009
, 01:10 AM
06-10-2009
, 01:34 AM
06-10-2009
, 01:42 AM
"nit" is a good summation 
The 92 streak is highly improbable organically - the odds are something like one in a billion that sharkscope would show a legitimate streak like this based on it's total number of HUSNGs tracked. However, there are millions of possible places for statistical outliers, and 92 isn't out of the range of believability. I do think worries that this is an AP/UB type situation are legitimate and I would want to see an investigation if I played on that particular small site. You could tell pretty quickly what was going on by looking at HHs.
The 92 streak is highly improbable organically - the odds are something like one in a billion that sharkscope would show a legitimate streak like this based on it's total number of HUSNGs tracked. However, there are millions of possible places for statistical outliers, and 92 isn't out of the range of believability. I do think worries that this is an AP/UB type situation are legitimate and I would want to see an investigation if I played on that particular small site. You could tell pretty quickly what was going on by looking at HHs.
06-10-2009
, 01:55 AM
Quote:
"nit" is a good summation
The 92 streak is highly improbable organically - the odds are something like one in a billion that sharkscope would show a legitimate streak like this based on it's total number of HUSNGs tracked. However, there are millions of possible places for statistical outliers, and 92 isn't out of the range of believability. I do think worries that this is an AP/UB type situation are legitimate and I would want to see an investigation if I played on that particular small site. You could tell pretty quickly what was going on by looking at HHs.
The 92 streak is highly improbable organically - the odds are something like one in a billion that sharkscope would show a legitimate streak like this based on it's total number of HUSNGs tracked. However, there are millions of possible places for statistical outliers, and 92 isn't out of the range of believability. I do think worries that this is an AP/UB type situation are legitimate and I would want to see an investigation if I played on that particular small site. You could tell pretty quickly what was going on by looking at HHs.
he's almost certainly playing at least some people who intentionally lose.
06-10-2009
, 08:03 AM
06-10-2009
, 08:34 AM
3rded. Really blahhh stretch.
Full Tilt Poker $80 + $4 Heads Up No Limit Hold'em Tournament - t20/t40 Blinds - 2 players
Speedukass (BB): t1555 M = 25.92
Hero (BTN/SB): t1445 M = 24.08
Pre Flop: (t60) Hero is BTN/SB with 8
7
Hero raises to t80, Speedukass raises to t240, Hero calls t160
Flop: (t480) K
9 6 (2 players)
Speedukass bets t300, Hero raises to t1205 all in, Speedukass says "echh tens ...", Speedukass says "nh ..", Speedukass folds
Final Pot: t1080
Hero wins t1080
Two notes:
1. Don't b/f TT here.
2. It's okay to call pre against somebody who's going to b/f TT here.
Full Tilt Poker $80 + $4 Heads Up No Limit Hold'em Tournament - t20/t40 Blinds - 2 players
Speedukass (BB): t1555 M = 25.92
Hero (BTN/SB): t1445 M = 24.08
Pre Flop: (t60) Hero is BTN/SB with 8
7Hero raises to t80, Speedukass raises to t240, Hero calls t160
Flop: (t480) K
9 6 (2 players)Speedukass bets t300, Hero raises to t1205 all in, Speedukass says "echh tens ...", Speedukass says "nh ..", Speedukass folds
Final Pot: t1080
Hero wins t1080
Two notes:
1. Don't b/f TT here.
2. It's okay to call pre against somebody who's going to b/f TT here.
06-10-2009
, 08:50 AM