Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
HU SNG red pro Melanie Weisner? HU SNG red pro Melanie Weisner?

08-03-2011 , 10:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barbra Streisand
dude, no.
dude, yes!
HU SNG red pro Melanie Weisner? Quote
08-03-2011 , 10:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bunzablood
But, we have an open relationship. This is because I like girls AND boys, preferably together.
I believe you, this actually makes a ton of sense.
HU SNG red pro Melanie Weisner? Quote
08-03-2011 , 02:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Callisto 5
For all you guys who pmed me during this thread about coaching to whom i said i was unable to cuz of schedule etc, i interestingly enough now have a bunch of free time since I haven't moved out of the country yet. so if you are still interested, pm me.

bustoness

[ ] unconfirmed
[x] confirmed
HU SNG red pro Melanie Weisner? Quote
08-03-2011 , 02:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by breadandbutter
Don't know if you're still reading this thread but first of all wanted to say I thought you seemed a very sympathetic woman/girl when I saw you on PAD some time ago and also want to congratulate you with your success in poker.

I disagree with the bolded part above though. It's false to assume men and women have an equal level of logical reasoning, in general(I know you personally don't belong to the "women side" in that regard). Ever since the first feminist wave people are brainwashed into believing men and women are equal in physical and mental abilities. We aren't equal. We are equal in rights and respect, but not in body and mind. With good reason. Since the beginning of mankind men and women both formed different abilities by nature. These typical male and female abilities were necessary to survive. Both men and women have different qualities. Just because we are equal in rights does not mean we are equal in who we are inside. It's common knowledge that men have more logic, in general. People make jokes about the difference in logical reasoning between men and women but there's truth in it. If i recall it right, I remember reading various studies and tests which show that men have more logic as women in general.

I think logical reasoning is the most important ability when it comes to playing poker. And risk-taking. Without taking risks it's hard to even START playing poker for real money. These are both qualities men excel in (again, in general). I think this is why far less women are successful in poker as men. However, I do think women in general are better in social situations (like you said as well).
You are such an obnoxious idiot. It is pathetic that there are so many people who are even more obnoxious and idiotic than you, but don't let that make you feel better. It doesn't make you not obnoxious or idiotic.

Men have long been thought to possess superior abilities in IQ tests such as spatial reasoning, but these attributes is not believed to be predominantly affected by the subjects' upbringing. For instance, boys are more likely to play sports which often has tactical elements, or board games, or creative games like lego and so on, whereas because of women's role as childbearers they are given dolls and so on. For instance, comparisons between the two genders in other cultures have resulted in different results, although sexism is rampant in most cultures for reasons that are not genetic, but social.

To explain with but one out of MANY reasons: lack of birth control and high mortality rate in early human history led to men being the natural choice for leaders, as women are more vulnerable and are less reliable due to primitive technology and understanding of biology. These tendencies created a tradition of having men in positions of power, and created a culture that reinforces these ideas.

These factors are no longer in play to the same extent in the modern day and therefore the seperation of roles is no longer necessary. These ideas are outdated and primitive. You sir, have primitive thinking.

You're stupid.
HU SNG red pro Melanie Weisner? Quote
08-03-2011 , 04:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sol Reader
You are such an obnoxious idiot. It is pathetic that there are so many people who are even more obnoxious and idiotic than you, but don't let that make you feel better. It doesn't make you not obnoxious or idiotic.

Men have long been thought to possess superior abilities in IQ tests such as spatial reasoning, but these attributes is not believed to be predominantly affected by the subjects' upbringing. For instance, boys are more likely to play sports which often has tactical elements, or board games, or creative games like lego and so on, whereas because of women's role as childbearers they are given dolls and so on. For instance, comparisons between the two genders in other cultures have resulted in different results, although sexism is rampant in most cultures for reasons that are not genetic, but social.

To explain with but one out of MANY reasons: lack of birth control and high mortality rate in early human history led to men being the natural choice for leaders, as women are more vulnerable and are less reliable due to primitive technology and understanding of biology. These tendencies created a tradition of having men in positions of power, and created a culture that reinforces these ideas.

These factors are no longer in play to the same extent in the modern day and therefore the seperation of roles is no longer necessary. These ideas are outdated and primitive. You sir, have primitive thinking.

You're stupid.
Ahahahahahah n1 ahhahahaha
HU SNG red pro Melanie Weisner? Quote
08-03-2011 , 11:54 PM
Oops by the way I meant

Quote:
...these attributes are NOW believed to be predominantly affected by the subjects' upbringing.
But I think it's clear what I meant in context.
HU SNG red pro Melanie Weisner? Quote
10-08-2011 , 05:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mecastyles
Is this what parties are like at the live events? I'm officially switching from online to live pro.
HU SNG red pro Melanie Weisner? Quote
10-19-2011 , 01:45 PM
Nice run in the WSOPE ME.
HU SNG red pro Melanie Weisner? Quote
04-17-2012 , 01:25 PM
Mel,

Would you please clear something up for me? I've been profitable at HUSNGs for over four years now, starting at $5 and worked my way up to $25s. The only reason I havent gone to $50s and higher is because all I ever see at those stakes are sharks/regs. And I keep see thread after thread of more pros calling themselves regs playing these level Sngs, and they really do have the stats to back it up. But how how exactly are so many regs at these games when I never seem to find any fish being the first to sit? In fact, most of the time when I rail these matches, I will scope both players and they are both winners. It just seems like it always comes down to two regs basically measuring egos. What percentage of the players at the higher stakes matches are truly -ROI? It seems so unrealistic for me to find hardly any at all. It seems like in this form of poker, it is unquestionable that the majority who play are regs, and that there must be a very small group of whales who continue to donate to this population. I should mention that it has always been the smaller sites that appeal to me(Cake, Bodog, Merge). In fact, I've only played on Stars and Tilt combined about 2 weeks. But I figure maybe things are different on those 2 sites because of the much bigger population. I've always avoided those sites mainly because I just hate their softwares. But now that I really want to move up in limits I feel like it would have to be on those sites. The high level BIs on the smaller sites are just DEAD. I'm asking all of this because I am seriously considering leaving the U.S. because we are about to have no options left online. I eventually want to play at levels where I can truly do this for a living. Is being a pro solely at HUSNGs basically a pipe dream at this point? Would I have to try specializing in something else?

All your insight is appreciated and I have thoroughly enjoyed the hell out of this thread.

P.S. If by some chance you make a pit stop in Birmingham, AL, there is definitely a milkshake in it for you on me.

Last edited by Pfantonio; 04-17-2012 at 01:31 PM.
HU SNG red pro Melanie Weisner? Quote
04-17-2012 , 01:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pfantonio
Mel,
The only reason I havent gone to $50s and higher is because all I ever see at those stakes are sharks/regs.
lol
HU SNG red pro Melanie Weisner? Quote
04-17-2012 , 02:24 PM
i guess its time to bring this gold back:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J0iIYg3mGl4
HU SNG red pro Melanie Weisner? Quote
04-17-2012 , 04:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pfantonio
P.S. If by some chance you make a pit stop in Birmingham, AL, there is definitely a milkshake in it for you on me.
Dude, never offer your milkshake to a girl before the 3rd date..in fact, don't ever mention it, just do it and say 'oops, did that just happen, sorry,' and deal with the consequences. That's what I do.
HU SNG red pro Melanie Weisner? Quote
04-17-2012 , 05:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bunzablood
Dude, never offer your milkshake to a girl before the 3rd date..in fact, don't ever mention it, just do it and say 'oops, did that just happen, sorry,' and deal with the consequences. That's what I do.
You misunderstood me. A little further back in this thread, some guy offered here an actual milkshake if she would meet him at borgata.
HU SNG red pro Melanie Weisner? Quote

      
m