If my maths are correct,
300(starting stack)*3(players)= 3BI(prize pool)- 0.07(rake)*3(players).
So 1BI =(300*3)/(3-0.21) = 322.58 chips. You need to add 22.6 chips to your starting stack to be EV+
I don't play on .com network, but I think everywhere micro are beatable. On the .fr, you can have positive EV prerakeback until 10€s.
However, I dunno if .com have the 40% rakeback monthly challenge for loosing players, 10% for winning players like on .fr. If so, you should avoid having a positive winrate and climb the limits to keep negative ROI to keep 40% rake back, if you go to the 10% it's hard to go back to 40%s after, I heard.
Yeah Rake is 8% on 0,25. Ive watched a coaching video recently and the coach said flash are only beatable if you get enough rakeback. He was playing mid to highstakes where there is lower rake. So I was wondering if they are still beatable on micros. And due to the fishiness of the pool maybe even with no good rakeback. So yeah my question remains...How much c/ev do we need. And what are actually good c/ev's on flash spins?
I put in 300c stacks in and 8% rake. It tells me I need 26 c/ev per game to break even. Its an older version so not accurate but I guess it'll be arround 26c no?
There were a post about the pool avg cev and I believe it was something like ~ 27-30 up to 2$. You can find it in the spins thread. In general flashes are all about the volume you can put in where reg spins are about the max cev you can get. And prepare for massive swings. Dropping 100 - 200 bins is pretty strd in flashes. Even when the games are good.
