Quote:
Originally Posted by omnomno
so I read his well recently and the guy acted like the one and only that approaches husngs with ranges, frequencies and game theory stuff, and now he says nonsense like that? how can u solve the game vs particular type of opponents and claim at the same time its not solved for other type of opponents lol
I think he's not contradicted himself. There's a difference between strongly solved and weakly solved. Strongly solve means that the best play has been found for
every situation that may come up- even e.g. when sb limps at 3bb and bb checks his entire range- if poker is strongly solved, then the optimal strat from here would be known.
High stakes regulars playing each other are probably getting close to weakly solving the game- i.e. the optimal strategy from the starting position, and subsequent situations arising from optimal play is known. Strongly solving the game is much harder (e.g. checkers/draughts is only weakly solved), and is what you are looking for when playing vs fish.