Quote:
Originally Posted by Insane_Steve
You know, I was considering a Ph.D. in stats with a thesis in poker related theory. And you just went and did this, which renders that whole idea moot.
wtg jackass >
In all seriousness I can't wait for this
You're joking, but fyi: None of the math here is particularly intense.
Quote:
Originally Posted by POPPYisABUSED69
a book will not change the player , help them a bit but hard workers always have a big edge.
btw. mersennary where is the promised gay porn?
I'll do some "research" tonight to pick what I want to include.
Quote:
Originally Posted by derosnec
there have been many moments in 2+2/training video history when i thought "great, now the games are ruined." but i still make money consistently, and i'm no poker genius. there was Fees' 6max free pdf, Spamz HHs, Mers ST videos, and so on. i cringed when i read that a free book is coming out in the low edge world of STs, especially since i play on regsville merge. but in the end these freebies always help me make more money, but maybe if i played higher stakes that wouldn't be the case, i dunno.
i'm not sure why it is that fish regs don't get a whole lot better with this stuff. i mean yeah games are always getting tougher but i seem to stay ahead of fish regs, and i'm no great theorist. maybe it's a lack of experience. having played 500 hundred gazillion billion games makes me more comfortable and less spazzy and more adaptive i think. so someone with 3,000 games under their belt with lots of free 2+2 theory crammed in their brain might get overloaded and misapply stuff in-game.
maybe another thing is fish regs don't do their own homework. there's a lot of stuff not in books that needs to be worked out mathematically. there's no time in-game to do them because of different ranges and stack sizes. i've done a good bit on my own, maybe enough that it keeps me one step ahead of fish regs.
also tilt issues are a biggie.
another is maybe i'm enjoying remarkably long-term good variance against them
This is a fantastic post, especially the first paragraph. It's a great quality to be able to have that self awareness and evidence awareness to conclude what you're concluding. Love it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Champaz
I think I recognize like 90% of the chapters, hmm I wonder why :P. Well atleast I got to read them before most people . Now let us all pray that our opponents won't read it :O.
On a more serious note ofcourse it's great when you know something that other regs don't but this information would have came out sooner or later in one form or another.
I would have prefered later but whatever I guess we are forced to grow if we want to continue pwning.
I would say about 50% of the material you haven't seen before (there is also material subtracted from the articles you saw). I hope FastTrackers enjoyed reading some of these articles in their infancy.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Emus
I think you'll see instantly impact to some extent; especially in those spots where the free eBook will post Nash like tables.
These don't really exist. I give a chart that shows a starting point example strategy for 12bb play, but it's highly exploitable (not that that's a bad thing against the general population). I give some readless 3bet jamming ranges 20bb deep but those will be far too tight against most regs. There's nothing in this ebook that just says "here are all my default ranges, now run and go copy me" (unlike FastTrack, where I answered those questions plus all the "and what ranges should I have against this opponent, and this type, and this type" all day every day). The ebook is more about situational awareness and how different hand types fit into those situations.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drooler
lol
Quote:
Originally Posted by gsp100
Since they are not playing that far from optimal in the first place a lot of study will only increase their edge over a fish reg a little bit, while even a small amount of study for the fishy reg will decrease the good reg's edge on the fish reg by much more.
Sounds like it could be true, but is it actually? Do you really think spamz's HH reviews helped the mediocre more than the talented and hardworking?
Quote:
Originally Posted by bunzablood
As for ChiRy, I've said it before, he's the husng glue. I'd vote for him if he ran for President.
He's simply the greatest. SO many good stories, too. His well will be the best personal thread this forum has ever seen. He has dirt on pretty much everybody. My idea of dirt is "hey, livb is grossly exaggerating by saying he was all-NYC for high school basketball on his website, lol livb". ChicagoRy's idea of dirt is...well I guess we'll all find out someday.