Quote:
Originally Posted by xSCWx
You should be cbetting the vast majority of the time, and a huge percentage of those cbets are going to be bluffs. The bigger you are betting the higher the percentage of the time your cbet will have to be successful. Thus, betting bigger than necessary may not be a leak in the sense that it is costing you chips directly, but it generally won't be optimal.
ok thanks, i bet less now and i think that help me to control pot when i catch draws and bluff cost me less.
i have another question:
how many time cbet against fish reg at low limit(and high stakes too)?
do you have stats about that?
profile: they call preflop oop a mini raise around one time of 3. They can adapt with float (or raise sometimes but not that much)on flop if you cbet too much.They are hyper nitty post flop and check always, but if they catch anything you can't bluff them even if you try to represent monster.Sometimes they can semi bluff,and they are very agressive with top pair bad kicker.
this kind of players are winners at 20$ 30$,they call too much oop and don't know how to fold if they catch for example two pairs(against obvious quinte or flush).I see big mistakes from them time to time on river.A lot of them are small losers at 50$ (around -1% ROI).
this nitty style (loose passive preflop but very nitty postflop) is more hard to play than cash, i don't know why? nitty style seem more profitable on HUSNG.
assume you have 2 strategy preflop:
-first you limp all the buttons and play 90% of hands (not at high level).It is hard to balance you range...
or
- you play like a cash game, fold crap hands and raise suited connectors,brodways with kicker 6+,all pairs,monster etc... the pot are bigger.
Last edited by skweek; 09-07-2008 at 07:36 PM.