Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
***** Beginner's Questions Thread ***** ***** Beginner's Questions Thread *****

08-03-2008 , 12:24 PM
What kind of software should I use to keep track of HUSNG and to review them. I know of poker tracker and HEM but was wondering if there is a more simple/cheap program that i can use?
08-03-2008 , 02:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by skates
depends what "unpredictably" means... like hyper-aggressive and erratic betting? open limp almost 100% on the button probably. if it's still on the passive size, yea minraise.

Why minraise and no raise to 200?
08-03-2008 , 05:39 PM
Quote:
What kind of software should I use to keep track of HUSNG and to review them. I know of poker tracker and HEM but was wondering if there is a more simple/cheap program that i can use?
popopop replayer. you should be able to google it.
08-03-2008 , 06:11 PM
What would be a good range for limping late in husngs.

I find my self on the button when we are around 15-25ish bbs deep with decent hands that i don't want to fold, but i don't want to raise vs aggressive villains because they will end up shoving over. suited stuff, q-9, 10-9s, k-8 and random stuff like that.
08-04-2008 , 12:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Highbeem
Why minraise and no raise to 200?
raising to 200 might be the best play. but there are some good reasons not to. it creates a big pot when your hand is not that strong. if villain calls, the pot will be 400 chips. that is almost 40% of the small stack! the situation post flop is most likely to be unclear. your edge as a better player won't help you in a situation like this. it might actually work against you because you may be too quick to fold.

a minraise will keep the pot more small, still give villain a chance to fold, and make it a lot less painful to fold post flop if you miss.
08-04-2008 , 12:59 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Takeover_inc
What would be a good range for limping late in husngs.

I find my self on the button when we are around 15-25ish bbs deep with decent hands that i don't want to fold, but i don't want to raise vs aggressive villains because they will end up shoving over. suited stuff, q-9, 10-9s, k-8 and random stuff like that.
if the villain is shoving too much, then trap him and call him with KJ, 88.... I wouldn't let it stop me from raising the hands i wanted to raise, unless the villain was really out of control with shoving. i would be raising around 60% limping 20 and folding 20....

does that sound right?
08-04-2008 , 01:25 AM
I still raise with my good hands, usually min though. I'm folding more than when stacks are larger. hands like q5 and stuff. I don't really believe in trapping. I'll start limping good drawing hands against alot of opponents though - t9s and such. And fwiw I'm raising 88 and snap calling a push. KJ prolly not unless villains really shoving wide.
08-06-2008 , 05:58 PM
08-07-2008 , 12:41 AM
^^^
Hmmm, without a solid read I'd check that river. Can't really tell if we're ahead or behind. So, imo, best to check it and see what he called us down with. Maybe we take the pot, maybe not, but this will be valuable information without costing us too much.
08-07-2008 , 09:33 AM
Thanks, well anyway I ended up betting and it turned out he checked the flush on the river :-(

But I stacked him 10 hands later ;-)
08-07-2008 , 09:50 AM
...

Last edited by pdr87; 08-07-2008 at 10:02 AM. Reason: I changed my mind - bad idea
08-07-2008 , 04:24 PM
Classic "How many hands" question? Can I claim badassitude (assuming solid winrate, obv) at 10K? 5K? 50K?
08-08-2008 , 07:10 PM
Also, if a guy's raising 50% of his buttons, does it behoove you to pretty much just 3bet the top 25% of your hands?
08-08-2008 , 07:56 PM
At what point do you quit a table when you're winning? I've been playing HU cash recently and have gotten up to $100 a few times at 30NL. I ended up losing half my stack twice to due bad beats/bad play and was just wondering should I just move to another table whenever I win a certain amount or just keep playing at the same table?
08-08-2008 , 08:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Micky08
At what point do you quit a table when you're winning? I've been playing HU cash recently and have gotten up to $100 a few times at 30NL. I ended up losing half my stack twice to due bad beats/bad play and was just wondering should I just move to another table whenever I win a certain amount or just keep playing at the same table?
The general advice is to keep playing so long as the game is good... If you lose half your winnings to a bad beat, just try to keep in mind that you were actually on track to win even more in that spot!

That being said, if sitting on a 333BB stack makes you uncomfortable (and therefore playing suboptimally), sure, go ahead and quit. No shame in that.

I think there's a Mike Caro quote that goes something like "People always ask after a loss, "Why didn't you quit when you were ahead two buy-ins?". Why didn't I quit? Because you never hear that same question when you're up 5 buy-ins at the end of the night!"
08-08-2008 , 11:34 PM
is there any merit in playing < 100bb stack players?
on my site there are alooot of ppl who sit with as low as 20bb.

at 100NL, by the avg time I take their stack i win like only 14$, cause the rest went to the rake. and when the roles are reversed and i double them up, often i can not make any profit anymore whatever i do cause the rake will exceed 20$ before i stack them again.

so my question is, is it even profitable to bother playing those guys? even if they suck ridic hard.

what is the minimum xBB you would/should accept to play against?
08-09-2008 , 06:08 AM
who is the best husngplayer on:

pokerstars
ipoker

?

are they good at cash game?
with no rakeback husng are EV-. Do you agree with me?
08-09-2008 , 06:27 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by skweek
with no rakeback husng are EV-. Do you agree with me?
no.
08-09-2008 , 09:23 AM
50NL, Stars or Tilt?
08-09-2008 , 03:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 80sSynthPop
Also, if a guy's raising 50% of his buttons, does it behoove you to pretty much just 3bet the top 25% of your hands?
You need a lot more info to determine that, but i think it's rare to find a player where you can profitably 3-bet 25%

Quote:
Originally Posted by 80sSynthPop
50NL, Stars or Tilt?
Stars has 5% rake compared to Tilts 10% doesn't it?
08-09-2008 , 05:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SSDas
Stars has 5% rake compared to Tilts 10% doesn't it?
It looks like they both cap it at 50 cents, .05 to the $1.00. After poking through the search archives I think I'm gonna go w/ Full Tilt. Plus, I sat and watched a guy on Full Tilt destroy a short stacker for like 5 buy-ins today at lunch.
08-09-2008 , 05:34 PM
How quick do you quit someone you may not have an edge against at lower limits.

Say they buy in for a full stack, raise their sb often, 3 bet you plenty and fairly play tight OOP.

Do you contine to play them ? If not how quickly do you quit them ?

With the rake at the level it is at 100nl and below is it worth playing vs. Lars Aggrobot the 40/35/4 from Linkoping for more than like 50 hands ?
08-09-2008 , 11:39 PM
I started playing $10 HU sit n goS recently and i realized that they are extremely soft.
At this level what range of hands would you consider calling or pushing all in with early, before blinds are even a factor? How different would this range be in turbos?
08-10-2008 , 02:44 AM
Whats a good BB/100 for nl50 HU esp on Stars...

Also who are some grinders I should watch out for....I dont really have the roll to play nl50 Hu full time so I just scout out tables..look for single tablers/mid stack(20-30$) donkeys...Sit down and clean them out than leave....
08-10-2008 , 01:50 PM
Who are the best HU players online and live?

I just wanna know some names and locations (sited they play on) so i can rail and watch vids of them etc.

I know of Krantz,wiltontilt vanessa selbst from CR.

Any ideas?

Thanks

      
m